Thursday, January 15, 2004

Bonecrker #15 - Abusive Schools II


Many teachers know exactly what they are doing by indoctrinating children. They do it on purpose... because they hate men and because they are intentionally trying to be subversive.

What's going on is most female teachers (especially the lesbian ones) and many male teachers are intentionally trying to instill certain values in the children they teach. They purposefully go against what most parents want their kids to absorb and much of what they are trying to program into our kids is deviant. They mask what they are doing under political correctness.

Typically, what they do is talk about something perfectly reasonable on the surface. Then, the moment you have your back turned, they throw in a bunch of deviant stuff.

For example, there is a big movement to separate out religion from government and our schools. It's perfectly reasonable to want no religion to have undo influence over our government or be taught as doctrine in our schools. But that's not what they are after. What they are after is to have the principals of atheism be dominant in government and be taught as doctrine in our schools. They actively attempt to shame and stamp out belief in God.

A weird twist on this theme is attempting to expose impressionable youths to Islam, Wicca, and other tenants that have a strong sick streak running through them. Specifically, what they do is portray these in an extremely idealistic light, never mentioning the strong undercurrent of evil flowing through those. One thing those kids will never be shown is the legions dancing around and cutting themselves and their neighbours with knives, like certain of the Islamic sects do (nothing to see here).

Other things they try to instil in kids... the idea that abortion is completely right morally, tolerance of the behaviours that lead to the spread of AIDS, promiscuity, homosexuality as a lifestyle choice (rather than a biological fact, for a small percentage of the population), the idea that men are inferior and woman are superior, that America is a country causing most of the evil in the world, tolerance of drug use, tolerance of pedophilia, the fact that certain minorities are over-represented in prison, and have other social problems, is the result of racism rather than choices they made, promiscuity is OK, acting like a man is not OK. The list goes on and on.

Schools are spending more and more time socializing kids in ways their parents would not approve of and less time educating those kids (this includes college, in a big way).

Worse, teachers feel quite smug about doing things to your kids in direct opposition to your rights as a parent. The whole issue of abortion without parental consent is one example. Another is vaccination. In most cases, the law is on your side, but unless you come right out and threaten the teacher with being arrested or sued, they won't stop.

Several people I know have had to do this to put an end to abuse of their children in school... anywhere from medical abuse to trying to get the kids thrown out of school for supposed misbehaviour (that turned out to be nothing more than the teacher simply not liking the kid).

It's a big, big issue that is mostly hidden. Having your kid inappropriately diagnosed as ADD and then force fed dangerous amphetamines and/or barbiturates, is only the tip of the iceberg.

Seriously, if you have kids, you need to keep VERY close tabs on what is happening to them in school. You'll run into everything from psycho man-hating bitches telling him he is a dumbass every 5 minutes, to some mincing, child hungry pedophile putting the moves on him during gym class.

Schools are dangerous for children.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
"Give us the child for 8 years and it will be Bolshevik forever." -- V.I. Lenin
.
"We must declare openly what is concealed, namely, the political function of the school...It is to construct communist society." -- V.I. Lenin
.
 "If the classroom situation is very heteropatriarchal -- a large beginning class of 50 to 60 students, say, with few feminist students -- I am likely to define my task as largely one of recruitment...of persuading students that women are oppressed." -- said Professor Joyce Trebilcot of Washington University in Who Stole Feminism: How Women Have Betrayed Women.
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:

Bonecrker #14 – Ritalin and Abusive Schools

Bonecrcker #109 – The Benefits of Boys Only Schools

Bonecrcker #179 – Subversive Teachers

A New Kind Of Bigotry

Phonics: Learning to Read – by Angry Harry

Why Did Teachers Adopt Poor Teaching Methods? -- by Angry Harry

Stop Helping the Boys! – by Angry Harry
.

Wednesday, January 14, 2004

Bonecrker #14 - Ritalin & Abusive Schools


This is more than just typical gender bias coming to play. It's hardcore child abuse. Its cooperation among mothers, female teachers and a handful of doctors to get children hooked on dangerous drugs (Ritalin is amphetamine, speed). The DEA is considering restricting Ritalin prescription, the same way it restricts Valium, for the same reason... wide spread abuse leading to recreational use by prescription. Also, Ritalin is one of the most common things used to make crystal meth. It's a widespread problem in schools. Typically, a woman will drag her son to doctor after doctor until she gets one that agrees to prescribe it... because most know damn well the kid does not have ADD and the mother is trying to use drugs to zone out her kid so she can spend her time eating bon bons, drinking, smoking crack, screwing drug dealers or whatever else she does instead of watching her children.


Understand that very bad people have infiltrated our schools with the deliberate intent to harm children. This is one of those ways. The deliberate with-holding of education is another. A third is attempting to brainwash children to accept sick and perverted ideals that are specifically at odds with what their parents want for them. Many women are only too glad to cooperate, unfortunately.

ADD is actually a rather rare condition that is related to to two things... mild to severe mental retardation and drug use. Those commercials you see on TV about possible adult ADD never mention that drug use (and severe alcohol abuse) is almost the exclusive cause of adult ADD. In children, you almost never see ADD (separate from drug use) except in mildly retarded children that got that way because their mothers drank heavily or smoked crack while pregnant.

If your ex-wife is attempting to abuse your children by getting dangerous prescription drugs or surgery for them, you need to get your lawyer on the phone double quick and get an order to cease and desist. Threaten to use it to take away custody (if she won't stop, challenge custody). This issue will come up with frightening regularity.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:

Bonecrcker #15 – Abusive Schools II

Bonecrcker #109 – The Benefits of Boys Only Schools

Bonecrcker #179 – Subversive Teachers

Diagnosis ODD -- Hawaiian Libertarian

Every Mass Shooting Over the Last 20 Years Has One Thing in Common... And It's Not Guns!

Tuesday, January 13, 2004

Bonecrker #13 - DV Myths = Cold War

Most discussions on domestic violence ignore the truth surrounding it. There are dangerous double standards and myths involved in the whole industry. The myth is that women are victims of domestic violence. The truth is that most calls to the police about domestic violence are women using the system to harm their husbands and children. Rarely are such calls used to protect themselves from actual domestic violence. The truth also is that women engage in domestic violence in both equal amounts and equal severity. The double standard means men rarely call police about it. It also means children are often left at risk from it.

To put it bluntly, the whole system is a huge lie. It rarely involves itself in real domestic violence between men, women and children. Instead, it is the opening gambit when a woman seeks to destroy her family, usually through divorce.  It's no accident that the system is set up this way. Powerful, evil people set it up that way on purpose.  If you pay attention to this and other issues, you start to see a disturbing pattern of intentional manipulation of our institutions and social norms. It's as if a "cold war" was being waged on the US, trying to tear it down from within.

Why, is an interesting question. It's largely unanswerable at this time. (Edit - it's Cultural Marxism). However, who, can often be answered (big example: Hillary Clinton). These people need to be disempowered at every turn. It means becoming aware of them and voting against them. It means boycotting those people, companies and other groups you see participating in this in various ways. Realistically, it means avoiding marriage and children like the plague, for the time being.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Bonecrker #20 – Rape Fantasies

Bonecrker #65 – The Repeating Patterns of Women Who Cry Rape

Bonecrker #68 – Two Things That Men Need to Know About Domestic Violence

Bonecrcker #117 – Feminism is a Purposefully Destructive Ideology Within a Larger Destructive Group

Bonecrcker #164 – The Media Is Being Used Against Us

EOTM: The Pearl Harbor of the Gender War: Rape and Sexual Harassment

EOTM: Sexual Harassment

EOTM: !!!!!!!!!!RAPE!!!!!!!!!!

Monday, January 12, 2004

Bonecrker #12 - The Most Feminacentrist Statement of the 20th Century

"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat. Women often have to flee from the only homes they have ever known. Women are often the refugees from conflict and sometimes, more frequently in today's warfare victms. Women are often left with the responsibility, alone, of raising the children" -- Hillary Clinton at the First Ladies' Conference on Domestic Violence in San Salvador, El Salvador, November 17, 1998

You dead and maimed guys are so lucky!

This speech is incredibly insidious. On the surface it's about women suffering as the unseen victims of war (the grain of truth to this lie). But there is a hell of alot implied by the way she chose to say it.

1) Absolutely no mention of the men who died or were maimed in this war. The implication is that their suffering is separate from their women and isn't worth mentioning.

2) There is a very strong implication that women had nothing to do with a war. It was a needless thing (caused by the thoughtless actions of men) that harms them. Actually, most wars are fought to protect women. History is one long string of good men sacrificing themselves to protect their women and children from bad people.

3) She mentions refugees as if they are only composed of women.

4) She comes right out and says the women are the primary victims of war. This isn't true. The primary victims of war are all the people killed by bullets, bombs and other horrors. These are mostly men. Not only are women secondary victims of war, but there are a hell of a lot of men and children that are also secondary victims.

5) The only time the loss of men is mentioned is how their deaths affect the women emotionally, and more importantly, financially. The irony is completely lost on her. The women she is speaking to probably care much more that they lost someone they loved rather than someone who took care of them. Obviously, Clinton can't see that. It never occurs to her. I bet more than one woman at the conference had a strange look on her face, thinking, what the heck is this gringa talking about? Why is she talking about unimportant stuff? I lost my husband. I loved him!

Guys, this fool was/is looking to be our next president. If you think laws and politics enable women now, imagine what it would be like after 4 years with her at the helm.
.


.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Mother of Calamity – from “The Lamentations of Matheolus", 1295 AD
.
It's true that women are lazy, but they are always ready to do harm. An evil woman just gets worse, becoming even more evil and wicked. It would take far too long for me to tell you everything about them, so for brevity's sake I shan't. Woman is not wise in this respect, for in her eagerness to do harm she only brings about her own ruin. According to the law, as I understand it, woman is not rational, nor does her love reside deep in her heart, but is there on her gaze for everyone to see. She entrusts her honour openly to her eyes, yet they can't help but fail to protect it, since folly animates her gaze. With all her words, her chatter, and her talk, she could break a heart of glass; all her actions are stupid and foolish. Woman can do no good, indeed, goodness is destroyed and obliterated by her. Many a war is begun by women and many a murder committed throughout the world; castles are burned and ransacked and the poor made destitute. As every man and woman knows, there isn't one war in a thousand that isn't started by a woman and by her sowing of discord. She is the mother of all calamities; all evil and all madness stem from her. Her sting is more venomous than a snake's; there isn't anyone who has anything to do with her who doesn't live to regret it.
.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:
.
A Sexist Commenter Sets Me Straight
.
Man Superior to Woman - Chapter Four
.
The All-Encompassing Power Of The Pussy

Sunday, January 11, 2004

Bonecrker #11 - Women & Racism


In my experience, racism plays a big part of what's going on with American women. Several times I have met women whose attraction to men is race based... the more negatively stereotyped, the better. Behind their back, they use racial slurs, even when talking about their partner. You talk to them and it becomes clear that they have strong racist views, usually negative. They are chasing bad men and the racist views colors these men as bad. So, they go after them. It's a complicated issue, and one that women will test you on to see if you will accept it from them.

For example, there was one stripper I knew. For awhile, she was sizing me up as a potential man. One day, out of the blue, she says this to me, "I've been with a lot of black boys." "Do you think less of me?" My answer to her at the time was, "Of course not."

But that was the wrong answer. My answer should have been yes. There are several reasons. First of all, she is testing me, not looking for reassurance of her worth. She wants to see if I will accept her in a devalued state. If the answer to that is yes, she loses interest (she did lol) and, at the same time, goes hog wild in the process of devaluing herself further. On the surface, she wants to know if I'm racist. But what she is really saying is she is racist, and a whore to boot. What's behind her statement is several years of screwing black men, but only from the criminal class of society. She did this in exchange for money and drugs. Certainly she would have no interest in a black man in a 3-piece suit and a law degree. Part of the manipulation has to do with what she means by "black boys." She means black men from the criminal class of society. But, phrasing it this way is a trap. If you say it devalues her, it seems like something racist (being with black guys devalues you) but, it's the having sex with men from the criminal class that devalues her. If you say no to this sort of behavior, it implies that you are racist. You'll see a lot of manipulation along these lines in society, especially with women. They want you to accept deviant behavior by associating it to minorities. Reject the behavior and they act as if you rejected the minority.

You will see this pattern repeatedly with American women... multiple minority partners, sometimes multiple children of mixed racial background. The big lie is that inter-racial couples are now accepted, so people feel free to get together with those they like. But the truth is that racism and fucked-upness are behind most of these relationships (white men with black women; seem to me to be the exception). Look for extreme racist views in one or both of the partners (should be the LAST thing in an inter-racial couple), a history of trading sex for money and drugs, and multiple one night stands, often resulting in children. Like any good lie, there is always a grain of truth in the center to give it credibility. There are lots of legitimate inter-racial marriages. You can tell the legitimate ones by their stability, high degree of education of both partners, and successful career the man has.

Racist views of women are a part of what's going on.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:
.
Bonecrcker #5 – Women Choosing Losers
.
Bonecrcker #84 - Women Going For Evil Losers
.
Bonecrcker #94 – Evil, Not Power, Is The Defining Attribute Of Women’s Attraction To Evil Men
.
Bonecrcker #120 – Women Pairing Up With Black Men Is Almost Always Based On Racism

Saturday, January 10, 2004

Bonecrker #10 - Women Choosing Scum


There are two reasons women go after scum... the one they tell themselves and the one that's true.

The one they tell themselves has to do with the archetype of redemption. Love redeems all things. To a woman, love redeeming a bad man proves the love is real (too bad their love ain't real, lol). Also, a man who treats everyone poorly but herself, must really love her. This is the biggest crock of bull-ony... but exploiting this sick, sad, self-deception will account for 90% of your free pussy if you live in the US.

Unfortunately, the real reason women dig bad/low quality men is they are bad/low quality themselves. These men have attitudes and behaviours that match their own.

Excitement is supposed to come from risk-taking behaviours that men like to engage in to have fun. But women find bad behavior exciting instead. It's normal for women to be attracted to men that like sky-diving, mountain climbing, and going off on adventures at the spur of the moment. It's abnormal for women to be attracted to men that like to beat women, have been in jail, and take drugs. But that's exactly what's going on today. All of the losers have all the women they can deal with (hehe, but evil people are bad for you....both ways), while all of the real men do without.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:
.
Bonecrcker #5 – Women Choosing Losers
.
Bonecrcker #6 – Women Choosing Extinction

Bonecrcker #16 – Women Love Assholes
.
Bonecrcker #84 – Women Going for Evil Losers
.
Bonecrcker #94 – Evil, Not Power, Is The Defining Attribute Of Women’s Attraction Toward Evil Men

Bonecrcker #118 – Women Who Marry Scumbags

Bonecrcker #144 – Why Women Are Attracted To Bad Men & Thugs

Friday, January 09, 2004

Bonecrker #9 - Boycott Those Who Disrespect Men


There is only one reason you see thinly veiled hatred everywhere in commercial media. The men who run that media have sold us out to pander to women. Way back in the beginning, it was simple, harmless fun designed to get a chuckle. Nobody had disrespect for men. That was the point. That's what made it funny.

But things have changed. Most women and many men have open hatred and contempt for men and our many accomplishments together and as individuals. It's not meant to be funny anymore. It's meant to be disrespectful.

There is, of course, only one real way to deal with this situation, and that's to hit these traitors where it hurts the most... in the wallet. Watch commercial media very carefully and boycott any product with advertising that shows hatred, contempt or disrespect toward men. This includes movies. You know what makes a movie a chick flick... open contempt, hatred and disrespect toward men. If some woman wants to go see a chick flick with you, tell her no and tell her why. Make it clear that you don't accept attitudes like that from her or from anyone else. If she tests you, dump her.

A very important part of this strategy is to never give a woman any money, ever, even if she is to go spend it on your behalf. Many men let the woman buy everything. Advertisers then use hatred, contempt, and disrespect towards men as a way to pander to these women who are making all the choices on which products to buy. It's very difficult to change the women so this is no longer an effective marketing strategy. But it is extremely easy to short circuit it... just don't give women any money and boycott products harmful to men. Eventually, they will go out of business.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Bonecrcker #164 – The Media Is Being Used Against Us

EOTM: Boycott Manbashers

Thursday, January 08, 2004

Bonecrker #8 - Humanity Transmitted Through Generations

.
Unfortunately for us, our behaviours aren't hard wired like those of many animals. Humans have free will. Most of what we are is transmitted from person to person when we raise children. All you need to do to know this is so, is to look at what happens when people refuse to raise their children (uncomfortably common). The children grow up feral. Most of the parts are there. But they aren't working right. Something of that child's basic humanity is missing. Sometimes, it is something quite large that is missing.
.
The point is, that John Grey (geee, could this guy be more of a closet homosexual trying to subvert marriage and family) crap about men and women being different, so most conflicts are caused by miscommunications, is a total lie. Yes, there are biological differences. They pale in comparison to the socialized differences. But, men and women were designed to be together. Our makeup, on all levels, is created in such a way that we fit together.

Before all this shit started to happen (somewhere around WWII is my best guess), men and women had been together relatively harmoniously for a loooooong time. Each chose the other based on the quality of person they were and worked hard to survive, thrive, and most importantly, refine what it means to be human and pass that on to the next generation.

That process has stopped cold. Although there were slight hints of it in our parents and our grandparents’ generation, it's gone hog wild in our generation. The fact that men and women are different has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that they are "poisoning the well" of human goodness, en masse. They are denying our basic humanity. The results are everywhere to see in our society. The message is very clear; they only want men who will cooperate in this sick agenda.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related:

Bonecrcker #153 – People Can Choose Anything They Want To… But They Can’t Choose The Consequences

Wednesday, January 07, 2004

Bonecrker #7 - PMS


PMS is one of those gigantic lies that is disguised by a grain of truth. American women have a diet that swings from cake, candy, cookies, ice cream, chocolate, cocaine and booze, on one hand... to subsisting on a single string bean for days at a time, on the other. Among many other things, this leaves your hormones completely out of whack. So when that time of the month comes around, they feel like shit. This is the grain of truth.

The lie that surrounds this grain of truth is that wild mood swings, hatred, and psychotic behavior go hand in hand with this. Yeah, women feel crappy because of the consequences of their foolish choices in life. But in no way does that lead to bad behavior. PMS is a myth... a myth that bad women try to use as an excuse for what they do.

The next time a woman tries to use PMS as an excuse for behaving badly, raise your eyebrows, look her straight in the eyes and say "So?"
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:
.

Tuesday, January 06, 2004

Bonecrker #6 - Women Choosing Extinction


I just downloaded the book, If Men Have All The Power, How Come Women Make The Rules? Excellent book, BTW. It's filled with all sorts of interesting information.

Here's a quote that got me to thinking (originally from The Woman That Never Evolved, by Sarah Blaffer Hardy):

"The central organizing principle of primate social life is competition between females and especially female lineages... Females should be, if anything, more competitive than males, not less, although the manner in which females compete may be less direct, less boisterous, and hence, more difficult to measure"
.
Normally, women compete fiercely amongst each other for men. Unlike animals, human children take a looooooong time to mature and our most powerful survival ability (our mind) takes significant effort to train and develop. Before the modern era, any woman stupid enough to take a weak, deviant man, who left after sex... died. At the very least, her child had slim to none survival value. Her lineage died out. Normally, women compete for the best men, that competition being intense when they are scarce. One thing they don't do is willingly have sex with an inappropriate man, unless there absolutely isn't anyone else. Men also compete for the best women. Or rather, for the status among our peers that attracts the best women. However, since we don't actually have to bear the children, that competition isn't as fierce. Survival of our line has less to do with who we choose and more to do with what we do. We (men) compete in who does things best. Women compete in who can get the best man. Men have the option of leaving. A woman who left usually died. That's the way it's always been and the way it should be.
.
But American women aren't normal. They have absolutely stopped competing for good men. They go out of their way to devalue them. They freely engage in behaviours that result in the extinction of their lineage. They leave. They refuse to raise their children. They engage in infidelity. They choose disposable partners based on deviant behavior. The reason why women seem to be so scarce is not because they have made themselves unavailable but because they have ceased having any interest whatsoever in extending their female lineage to the next generation. There is a natural consequence for that... extinction. The children of these women grow up powerless and feral, with increasingly lower status. Eventually, their lines will disappear.

The question we should be asking ourselves is, are we a valuable prize that would normally be fiercely competed over? If you are healthy, strong, successful, educated and have values that would promote the well being of a family, then that answer is yes. We have been lied to, repeatedly and in a systematic manner. What is interesting is what might happen if you left our abnormal women and went someplace where the women are desperately competing with eachother for the best men. Especially if most of the men who live there don't have these traits. You might come away with a different opinion of where you are in the pecking order.

Food for thought.
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:
.
.
.

Monday, January 05, 2004

Bonecrker #5 - Women Choosing Losers

All women say they want a dominant, successful, high status man with enlightened values. It is extremely easy to identify where a man is in the pecking order; by his job, by his dress, by the way he talks and acts and by the way other men treat him. Everyone knows where a man stands.

This includes women, who could easily snap up a man like this who freely advertises if he is available or not.

The problem is that almost no women actually follow through with this behavior. Dominant, successful, high status men with enlightened values are regularly passed up for dangerous, weak, emotionally unstable drug dealers with bad BO and a rap sheet as long as my arm. The younger and more attractive a woman is, the more likely she is to ignore the good men and screw as many of the bad men as she can get her hands on. Not all women do this. Some screw as many fraternity brothers as they can handle a night, just as long as they are drunk/high and treat her like dirt. Any man who doesn't act this way is labelled a loser, no matter how high status or macho. It's hilarious, and deeply, deeply sick.

Then, when a woman reaches about age 25, she starts to hunt for a man who is both wealthy and weak willed. Both qualities are very important, because her sole purpose for hunting this man is to attach herself vampire-like onto him and drain him for all he is worth. They continue to screw bad men during the entire marriage. Strong willed men quickly say no to this crapola and move on to the next woman. After a while, they start to wonder if all women are vampires trying to trick them into a bad situation. Certainly they don't meet anyone who actually cares for him and sincerely wants to be his wife.

Many of our country's most powerful men are either unmarried, taken to the cleaners by divorce, or are stuck in a marriage that is an obvious lie, often making up for it with dishonourable behaviour. A perfect example of this is Bill Clinton. His wife is an obvious lesbian who only married him because he was going places and could further her own political ambitions (the pay off isn't always in money, lol).

I'm tempted to say that American women are unable to recognize signs of status, power and high quality in men. But it's not true. They know full well what the deal is and purposefully choose the weak, psychotic, scum of the earth until they want a meal ticket.

Real men are left without.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:
.
Bonecrcker #6 – Women Choosing Extinction
.
Bonecrcker #10 – Women Choosing Scum
.
Bonecrcker #84 – Women Going for Evil Losers
.
Bonecrcker #94 – Evil, Not Power, Is The Defining Attribute Of Women’s Attraction To Men

Bonecrcker #118 – Women Who Marry Scumbags

Bonecrcker #144 – Why Women Are Attracted To Bad Men & Thugs

Sunday, January 04, 2004

Bonecrker #4 - Immature or Evil?


I think it's dangerous to chock women’s extremely fucked up behaviour to capriciousness, childishness and immaturity. These are innocent qualities you attribute to children that often make them endearing. You tolerate them. The crap that women do is much more akin to what criminals do......a repeated pattern of victimization with testing before hand to see if it is safe. If you tolerate criminals, they see it as a green light....same with women. Children, on the other hand, with very rare exceptions, are intrinsically good. They need guidance, not suppression of evil instincts and behaviour. Children grow up healthy and wealthy and wise, with proper guidance. American women are completely unaffected by guidance.

To put it another way, American women are not walking astray. They are engaged in intentionally evil acts with full awareness of what they are doing. If it was the former, you would simply shepherd them to another, better way. Since it's the latter, your behaviour must be designed to severely limit your potential as a victim.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:

Bonecrcker #98 – Are Women Children or Adults?

Women and Children

Letter to His Son – by Lord Chesterfield, 1748

Saturday, January 03, 2004

Bonecrker #3 - Shaming Language


One liners like "get a life" are attempts at manipulation. Women use them constantly. What they mean by "life" is whatever behaviours, attitudes and way of living (in this case, as a servile worm) they want. The implied message is that whatever you are doing instead of this is weak, wrong, bad, unworthy and worthless. If they actually came right out and said what everyone already knows they mean......"Stop behaving independently and demanding better treatment and certainly don't make me compete against better women, because that's wrong to do and it somehow makes you a weak and worthless person".....they might get a little bit of resistance.

So, instead, they say it in a manipulative manner. The real message is in what's implied and the knee-jerk emotional response they are trying to evoke. Like all manipulations, it relies on you being fooled by it. 90% of all women's power is based on similar illusions. If men ever wised up, en masse.....they'd be in for some serious trouble.
.
Previous Bonecrker Index Next
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:
.
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
"One of the most effective ways I have seen women using to gain power over men is by shaming men, using their tongue to put men down, to shame their sexuality, to shame their success." -- Char Tosi, Founder of Women Within in Good Will Towards Men by Jack Kammer
.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
.
"Shaming tactics." This phrase is familiar to many Men's Rights Activists. It conjures up the histrionic behavior of female detractors who refuse to argue their points with logic. Yet women are not the only ones guilty of using shaming tactics against men. Male gynocentrists use them, too.

Shaming tactics are emotional devices meant to play on a man's insecurities and shut down debate. They are meant to elicit sympathy for women and to demonize men who ask hard questions. Most, if not all, shaming tactics are basically ad homimem attacks.

Anyway, it might be helpful to categorize the major shaming tactics that are used against men whenever a discussion arises about feminism, men's issues, romance, etc. The following list contains descriptions of shaming tactics, some examples of quotes employing the tactics, and even color-coded aliases for mnemonic purposes. Enjoy.
.
Charge of Irascibility (Code Red)
.
Discussion: The target is accused of having anger management issues. Whatever negative emotions he has are assumed to be unjustifiable. Examples:

- "You're bitter!"
- "You need to get over your anger at women."
- "You are so negative!"

Response: Anger is a legitimate emotion in the face of injustice. It is important to remember that passive acceptance of evil is not a virtue.
.
Charge of Cowardice (Code Yellow)

Discussion: The target is accused of having an unjustifiable fear of interaction with women. Examples:

- "You need to get over your fear."
- "Step up and take a chance like a man!"
- "You're afraid of a strong woman!"

Response: It is important to remember that there is a difference between bravery and stupidity. The only risks that reasonable people dare to take are calculated risks. One weighs the likely costs and benefits of said risks. As it is, some men are finding out that many women fail a cost-benefit analysis.
.
Charge of Hypersensitivity (Code Blue) - The Crybaby Charge

Discussion: The target is accused of being hysterical or exaggerating the problems of men (i.e., he is accused of playing "Chicken Little"). Examples:

- "Stop whining!"
- "Get over it!"
- "Suck it up like a man!"
- "You guys don't have it as nearly as bad as us women!"
- "You're just afraid of losing your male privileges."
- "Your fragile male ego ..."
- "Wow! You guys need to get a grip!"

Response: One who uses the Code Blue shaming tactic reveals a callous indifference to the humanity of men. It may be constructive to confront such an accuser and ask if a certain problem men face needs to be addressed or not ("yes" or "no"), however small it may be seem to be. If the accuser answers in the negative, it may constructive to ask why any man should care about the accuser's welfare since the favor will obviously not be returned. If the accuser claims to be unable to do anything about the said problem, one can ask the accuser why an attack is necessary against those who are doing something about it.
.
Charge of Puerility (Code Green) - The Peter Pan Charge

Discussion: The target is accused of being immature and/or irresponsible in some manner that reflects badly on his status as an adult male. Examples:

- "Grow up!"
- "You are so immature!"
- "Do you live with your mother?"
- "I'm not interested in boys. I'm interested in real men."
- "Men are shirking their God-given responsibility to marry and bear children."

Response: It should be remembered that one's sexual history, marital status, parental status, etc. are not reliable indicators of maturity and accountability. If they were, then we would not hear of white collar crime, divorce, teen sex, unplanned pregnancies, extramarital affairs, etc.
.
Charge of Endangerment (Code Orange) - The Elevated Threat Charge

Discussion: The target is accused of being a menace in some undefined manner. This charge may be coupled with some attempt to censor the target. Examples:

- "You guys are scary."
- "You make me feel afraid."

Response: It may be constructive to point out that only bigots and tyrants are afraid of having the truth expressed to them. One may also ask why some women think they can handle leadership roles if they are so threatened by a man's legitimate freedom of expression.
.
Charge of Rationalization (Code Purple) - The Sour Grapes Charge

Discussion: The target is accused of explaining away his own failures and/or dissatisfaction by blaming women for his problems. Example:

- "You are just bitter because you can't get laid."

Response: In this case, it must be asked if it really matters how one arrives at the truth. In other words, one may submit to the accuser, "What if the grapes really are sour?" At any rate, the Code Purple shaming tactic is an example of what is called "circumstantial ad hominem."
.
Charge of Fanaticism (Code Brown) - The Brown Shirts Charge

Discussion: The target is accused of subscribing to an intolerant, extremist ideology or of being devoted to an ignorant viewpoint. Examples:

- "You're one of those right-wing wackos."
- "You're an extremist"
- "You sound like the KKK."
- "... more anti-feminist zaniness"

Response: One should remember that the truth is not decided by the number of people subscribing to it. Whether or not certain ideas are "out of the mainstream" is besides the point. A correct conclusion is also not necessarily reached by embracing some middle ground between two opposing viewpoints (i.e., the logical fallacy of "False Compromise").
.
Charge of Invirility (Code Lavender)

Discussion: The target's sexual orientation or masculinity is called into question. Examples:

- "Are you gay?"
- "I need a real man, not a sissy."
- "You're such a wimp."

Response: Unless one is working for religious conservatives, it is usually of little consequence if a straight man leaves his accusers guessing about his sexual orientation.
.
Charge of Overgeneralization (Code Gray)

Discussion: The target is accused of making generalizations or supporting unwarranted stereotypes about women. Examples:

- "I'm not like that!"
- "Stop generalizing!"
- "That's a sexist stereotype!"

Response: One may point out that feminists and many other women make generalizations about men. Quotations from feminists, for example, can be easily obtained to prove this point. Also, one should note that pointing to a trend is not the same as overgeneralizing. Although not all women may have a certain characteristic, a significant amount of them might.
.
Charge of Misogyny (Code Black)

Discussion: The target is accused of displaying some form of unwarranted malice to a particular woman or to women in general. Examples:

- "You misogynist creep!"
- "Why do you hate women?"
- "Do you love your mother?"
- "You are insensitive to the plight of women."
- "You are mean-spirited."
- "You view women as doormats."
- "You want to roll back the rights of women!!"
- "You are going to make me cry."

Response: One may ask the accuser how does a pro-male agenda become inherently anti-female (especially since feminists often claim that gains for men and women are "not a zero-sum game"). One may also ask the accuser how do they account for women who agree with the target's viewpoints. The Code Black shaming tactic often integrates the logical fallacies of "argumentum ad misericordiam" (viz., argumentation based on pity for women) and/or "argumentum in terrorem" (viz., arousing fear about what the target wants to do to women).
.
Charge of Instability (Code White) - The White Padded Room Charge

Discussion: The target is accused of being emotionally or mentally unstable. Examples:

- "You're unstable."
- "You have issues."
- "You need therapy."
- "Weirdo!"

Response: In response to this attack, one may point to peer-reviewed literature and then ask the accuser if the target's mental and/or emotional condition can explain the existence of valid research on the matter.
.
Charge of Selfishness (Code Silver)

Discussion: This attack is self-explanatory. It is a common charge hurled at men who do not want to be bothered with romantic pursuits. Examples:

- "You are so materialistic."
- "You are so greedy."

Response: It may be beneficial to turn the accusation back on the one pressing the charge. For instance, one may retort, "So you are saying I shouldn't spend my money on myself, but should instead spend it on a woman like you ---and you accuse me of being selfish?? Just what were you planning to do for me anyway?"
.
Charge of Superficiality (Code Gold) - The All-That-Glitters Charge

Discussion: The charge of superficiality is usually hurled at men with regard to their mating preferences. Examples:

- "If you didn't go after bimbos, then ..."
- "How can you be so shallow and turn down a single mother?"

Response: Average-looking women can be just as problematic in their behavior as beautiful, "high-maintanence" women. Regarding the shallowness of women, popular media furnishes plenty of examples where petty demands are made of men by females (viz., those notorious laundry lists of things a man should/should not do for his girlfriend or wife).
.
Charge of Unattractiveness (Code Tan) - The Ugly Tan Charge

Discussion: The target is accused of having no romantic potential as far as women are concerned. Examples:

- "I bet you are fat and ugly."
- "You can't get laid!"
- "Creep!"
- "Loser!"
- "Have you thought about the problem being you?"

Response: This is another example of "circumstantial ad hominem." The target's romantic potential ultimately does not reflect on the merit of his arguments.
.
Charge of Defeatism (Code Maroon)


Discussion: This shaming tactic is akin to the Charge of Irascibility and the Charge of Cowardice in that the accuser attacks the target's negative or guarded attitude about a situation. However, the focus is not so much on the target's anger or fear, but on the target's supposed attitude of resignation. Examples:

- "Stop being so negative."
- "You are so cynical."
- "If you refuse to have relationships with women, then you are admitting defeat."
- "C'mon! Men are doers, not quitters."

Response: The charge of defeatism can be diffused by explaining that one is merely being realistic about a situation. Also, one can point out that asking men to just accept their mistreatment at the hands of women and society is the real attitude that is defeatist. Many men have not lost their resolve; many have lost their patience.
.
Threat of Withheld Affection (Code Pink) - The Pink Whip

Discussion: The target is admonished that his viewpoints or behavior will cause women to reject him as a mate. Examples:

- "No woman will marry you with that attitude."
- "Creeps like you will never get laid!"

Response: This is an example of the logical fallacy "argumentum ad baculum" (the "appeal to force"). The accuser attempts to negate the validity of a position by pointing to some undesirable circumstance that will befall anyone who takes said position. Really, the only way to deal with the "Pink Whip" is to realize that a man's happiness and worth is not based on his romantic conquests (including marriage).

Friday, January 02, 2004

Bonecrker #2 - Local vs. Foreign Women


Men and women are two sides of the same coin. Without each other, there can be no fulfillment and no peace of mind. Together, there is life. This is the way it has been since the very beginning. It is an active thing, not a passive one. It's not enough for the people to just show up in each others lives. Each of you needs to actively love the other.

Many American men are willing to do this. Almost all American women are not. To make matters worse, these women do not value the men who are willing to love them. Instead, they value the men who couldn’t give a shit about anything. He gets laid constantly and gives nothing to anyone (even himself). Since this type of man is good for nothing and is often a criminal, the last thing he is interested in or is capable of is taking care of a woman or a family. Women are also like this themselves, but pretend they are not. That pretending often extends towards making a phoney marriage and having several children she has no intention of putting any effort into raising. Most of the time, the point of the marriage is to manipulate the system into fleecing a good man of all his possessions.....rinse, repeat, until she gets too old.

This is not normal. For whatever reason, it is a problem endemic to westernized countries but is worst in the US, where our laws seriously enable these behaviours.

What many American men are figuring out though is they don't have to put up with this. By understanding the problem and its various aspects and, most importantly, the actual depth of the problem, he can avoid most of it, even fight back. The biggest obstacle though, is he is incomplete without a legitimate love in his life. American women use this fact as their greatest source of sinister manipulation. They will dangle the image of this in front of you constantly but never, ever give it to you. The reason is simple: they can't. Because they can't, they are completely unacceptable as anything but a casual sexual fling. But one that is constantly trying to do you harm, requiring extreme vigilance and protective measures. Hopping from one loser to the next, in the vain hope that the next one might not be like this is a depressing way to live. Rather than find a rare jewel, most men simply give up after a while and retire from "the game".

Most men don't know that this is abnormal. They think all women are like this and have always been this way. That's a dirty lie. A lie that women in this country foster in an attempt to keep men from looking around. It turns out, that things were never like this for our grandfathers and great grandfathers. It's a recent problem. More importantly, it's a localized one.

In large chunks of the world, women aren't like this. They are the way they are supposed to be. If you bond with one and then love them, they will love you back. Although this is only the bare minimum needed for a good marriage and a good life, it changes things dramatically.

This means that it is a good idea to date a number of women from these places. Because you will find a jewel there eventually. No matter what, you will find a large pool of women who are sincere in their attempts to be with you. Some of these women will be sexually promiscuous. Some of them will be nuns. Most will be somewhere in between. Luckily, sincerely loving women will be common, no matter what she is like elsewise.......because it's a seperate issue. If you want a nun or a tart, a schoolteacher, a welfare mom or a doctor, you will find someone sincere. Since you will also find the occassional evil person mixed in, you must learn to tell the difference. But the odds are stacked in your favour.

That just doesn't exist in the US anymore (but it was once the rule, not the exception).
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.

Bonecrker #1 - Abusive Behaviour

The struggle for dominance is a natural and normal part of human sexuality. There was this very funny joke on Star Trek the Next Generation, where Worf makes a comment that Klingon women like to throw heavy objects (with this introverted, lustful expression). What makes this joke funny is that both men and women in lust, yell, hit each other, throw things around and say nasty things to each other. Passion tends to leap out at odd times into unpredictable behaviour. This is the animal part of us refusing to be caged anymore. People in love fight a lot.


But abuse is something different. It is a weak, evil person attempting to make themselves feel better by inflicting suffering on another. It has sadistic and masochistic qualities. The people who do it will only do it if it is safe to do so. Men who do this tend to get drunk/high and then make up an excuse to beat their wives (substance abuse is a big, BIG part of abuse). Women tend to engage in protracted campaigns to get their partner to abuse them. The most common form of this is to be as disrespectful of the man as possible, especially in public. Physical abuse of the man is also very common. They keep it up until the man hits them. Then, they try to condition the man to hit them on a regular basis. Most importantly, they actively select only men that will beat them. They are very good at this. If they accidentally choose a man who won't ever beat them, they will make his life miserable and then abandon him.

The best, most effective way to handle abuse, for both men and women, is to nip it in the bud. Absolutely refuse to even give the time of day to anyone who even gives you the slightest possible suspicion they are abusive. At even the slightest hint of abuse, break things off immediately and refuse to ever talk to that person again.....no exceptions. This is important because abusers will test the waters with you by seeing if you will take them back. Make sure they find out that you won't.

This doesn't mean you break up immediately with someone just because you had a fight though. You will fight bitterly all the time with anyone you have passion with. It's the sadistic and masochistic qualities you are looking out for. Drug/alcohol use is a big red flag, as is any sort of criminal past. Especially look for any sort of past abusive relationships. Women that have been beaten by partners and/or raped, are big no-no's. It's extremely un-PC to say so, but most women who have been raped by someone they know went out of their way to be with a high-risk man. Again, drugs and alcohol are a big factor. You definitely don't want a woman like that. She will torture you incessantly for not being a rapist scumbag yourself.

It should go without saying that women who engage in child abuse/neglect deserve to be pariahs....accommodate them. They are completely unsuitable for even the most casual sexual fling.

Any woman that is any way involved with the sex for money industry (stripping, porn, prostitution, and politics) has 90% of her screws loose. This industry is all about letting someone beat them in exchange for cocaine, meth and other speedy drugs. Run very fast in the opposite direction.

Warning......the cycle of abuse tends to make both partners obsessed with each other. Obsession is caused by all situations where pain and pleasure are randomly doled out (just look at gambling, lol). If you fail to nip these relationships in the bud, don't be surprised if you discover you can't later give them up, no matter how bad it gets. Also, don't be surprised if your partner leaps out at you with a butcher knife from the bushes some dark night. Having evil people obsessed with you is a very bad thing.
.
Bonecrker Index Next
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:

Bonecrcker #13 – DV Myths = Cold War

Bonecrcker #68 – Two Things That Men Need To Know About Domestic Violence
.
Bonecrcker #87 – Abuse Is A Game You Can’t Win
.
Bonecrcker #105 - Stalkers

Bonecrcker #180 - Sarcasm

Thursday, January 01, 2004

The Book of Bonecrker - Table of Contents

.
.

Bonecrker #1 - Abusive Behaviour

Bonecrker #2 - Local vs. Foreign Women

Bonecrker #3 - Shaming Language

Bonecrker #4 - Immature or Evil?








Bonecrker #12 - The Most Feminacentrist Statement of the 20th Century 
.





















































































Bonecrcker #99 – Living Together is a Scam

Bonecrcker #100 – The Problem with Pre-Nups

Bonecrcker #101 – Why You Must Never Give a Woman Any Money

Bonecrcker #102 – What Matters is the Amount of Power and Choice You Have in a Relationship

Bonecrcker #103 – Raising Your Sexual Status

Bonecrcker #104 – Sexual Status is Similar to Employment Status

Bonecrcker #105 - Stalkers

Bonecrcker #106 – Captain Free Therapist

Bonecrcker #107 – Feminism is a Purposefully Destructive Ideology within a Larger Destructive Group

Bonecrcker #108 – Feminism Pushes the Whore/Customer Model

Bonecrcker #109 – The Benefits of Boys-Only Schools

Bonecrcker #110 – The Problem With Discussing Things With Women

Bonecrcker #111 – Gaining Power With Women

Bonecrcker #112 – Who Cares What Women Are Thinking?

Bonecrcker #113 – Everything Out of a Woman’s Mouth is a Lie

Bonecrcker #114 – To All The Girls I’ve Loved Before

Bonecrcker #115 – Women Go To Singles Events To Be Seen, Not To Pick Up Men

Bonecrcker #116 – Can I Ask You A Quick Question? You Married?

Bonecrcker #117 – Would You Strip Down In A Room With A Crack Addict?

Bonecrcker #118 – Women Who Marry Scumbags

Bonecrcker #119 – Sleeping With Single Moms and Cohabitating

Bonecrcker #120 – Women Pairing Up With Black Men Is Almost Always Based On Racism

Bonecrcker #121 – Women Only Have What Rights Men Give Them

Bonecrcker #122 – The Advantage The Big City Has Over The Small Town

Bonecrcker #123 – One of the Most Important Reasons to Have More Than One Woman at Once

Bonecrcker #124 – Women on Online Personals Are Just Wasting Your Time

Bonecrcker #125 – The Four Problems With Serial Monogamy

Bonecrcker #126 – A Woman’s Need To Talk Is One Of The Key Methods Of Manipulating Them

Bonecrcker #127 – Timing is Important

Bonecrcker #128 – Women as “Friends”

Bonecrcker #129 – Eye Contact

Bonecrcker #130 – Never Allow a Woman to Call You a Friend Until You Have Had Sex at Least Once

Bonecrcker #131 – You Might As Well Be An Unemployed Loser Living In A Van Down By The River

Bonecrcker #132 – Finding and Approaching Women

Bonecrcker #133 – Don’t Date Women

Bonecrcker #134 – Choosing Not To Marry Is Much More Involved Than Just Saying “Hey, I Don’t Want To Be Married.”

Bonecrcker #135 – With Gay Marriage Legal, Gays Might Stop Getting Into Marriages That Are a Lie

Bonecrcker #136 – Not All That Opposed To Gay Marriage

Bonecrcker #137 – Be a Lover, Not a Provider

Bonecrcker #138 – Sexist! Offensive!

Bonecrcker #139 – Religious Women and Projection

Bonecrcker #140 – Lesbian Women

Bonecrcker #141 – If You Don’t Have Sex On The First Date, Your Chances Of Having Sex With Her At All Are Slim

Bonecrcker #142 – Buffy & Xena

Bonecrcker #143 – Hold Out The Lure Of Validation… But Don’t Give It To Them

Bonecrcker #144 – Why Women Are Attracted To Bad Men & Thugs

Bonecrcker #145 – Feminism Causes Rape

Bonecrcker #146 – No Cover Charge For The Ladies

Bonecrcker #147 – The Dishonesty At N.O.W.

Bonecrcker #148 – Women Who Want To Cheat With You

Bonecrcker #149 – Women Don’t Actually Have Personality Disorders – They Have Asshole-ism

Bonecrcker #150 – Women With Past Abusive Partners

Bonecrcker #151 – The Woman Who Is The Exception Phenomena

Bonecrcker #152 – The Predatory Female

Bonecrcker #153 – People Can Choose Anything They Want To… But They Can’t Choose The Consequences

Bonecrcker #154 – Women Are Bitches To Nice Girls

Bonecrcker #155 – Types of Bad Advice

Bonecrcker #156 – Friends With Benefits

Bonecrcker #157 – Eating Disorders

Bonecrcker #158 – Part of Breaking-Up is About the Drama

Bonecrcker #159 – Men Who Sleep On The Couch

Bonecrcker #160 – Good Job On The Stats!

Bonecrcker #161 – The Old “Fat But Working On It” Line

Bonecrcker #162 – Women’s “Requirements” in a Man

Bonecrcker #163 – A “Real Man” Wouldn’t Shun a Woman with Kids

Bonecrcker #164 – The Media Is Being Used Against Us

Bonecrcker #165 – “The Problem” Is So Pervasive That It Is Difficult To Avoid

Bonecrcker #166 – Seeking After Money Is Not An Effective Means Of Getting Women

Bonecrcker #167 – Advice For Women On Inviting Guys To Approach You

Bonecrcker #168 – You Can’t Assume You Are Dealing With Nice, Normal, Rational, Loving People

Bonecrcker #169 – America Is Not A Socialist Country?

Bonecrcker #170 – Normal Looking Girls Get Hit On More Than Hot Looking Women

Bonecrcker #171 – The Problem Isn’t the Body, It’s the Mind

Bonecrcker #172 – Social Proofing Has Negative Survival Value For Women

Bonecrcker #173 – Questions For The Bonecrcker

Bonecrcker #174 – The Measure Of A Person’s Worth Is Their Actions

Bonecrcker #175 – Do Women Really Choose Men, Or Do Men Choose Women?

Bonecrcker #176 – Women Making More Money Than Their Husbands

Bonecrcker #177 – Responsibility And Power Go Hand In Hand

Bonecrcker #178 – Love Is A Verb

Bonecrcker #179 – Subversive Teachers

Bonecrcker #180 - Sarcasm

Bonecrcker #181 - Women Don’t Hate Men, But They Don’t Love Them Either

Bonecrcker #182 – Women Want Strong Emotions But Don’t Care If Those Emotions Are Negative

Bonecrcker #183 – Ladder Theory