NO MA'AM

Friday, March 23, 2007

A,B,C,D,E,F

IN THEIR OWN WORDS:
.
GHIJKL: http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/03/g-to-l.html
.
MNOPQR: http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/03/mnopqr.html
.
STUVWXYZ: http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/03/stuvwxyz.html

.
***************************************************************

ANGIER, DAVID

"If anyone is prosecuted for filing a false report, then victims of real attacks will be less likely to report them." -- David Angier (Massachusetts District Attorney)

.
****************************************************************

.
ATKINSON, TI-GRACE (1938 - )

"The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist" -- Ti-Grace Atkinson "Amazon Odyssey" (p. 86)

"Feminism is the theory, lesbianism is the practice." -- Ti-Grace Atkinson

"I propose that the phenomenon of love is the psychological pivot in the persecution of women." -- Ti-Grace Atkinson, Radical Feminism and Love

"The price of clinging to the enemy [a man] is your life. To enter into a relationship with a man who has divested himself as completely and publicly from the male role as much as possible would still be a risk. But to relate to a man who has done any less is suicide.... I, personally, have taken the position that I will not appear with any man publicly, where it could possibly be interpreted that we were friends." -- Ti-Grace Atkinson, Amazon Odyssey (New York: Links Books, 1974), pp. 90, 91.

****************************************************************

.
BANE, MARY JO

"In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them" -- Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Welleslry College and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman

*******************************************************************

(de) BEAUVOIR, SIMONE (1908-1986)
.

"A world where men and women would be equal is easy to visualize, for that precisely is what the Soviet Revolution promised." -- Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, (New York, Random House, 1952), p.806
.

"No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one." -- Interview with Simone de Beauvoir, "Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma," Saturday Review, June 14, 1975, p.18

"Private property appears: master of slaves and of the earth, man becomes the proprietor also of woman....Here we see the emergence of the patriarchal family founded upon private property. In this type of family, woman is subjugated." -- Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/ethics/de-beauvoir/2nd-sex/ch03.htm

***************************************************************

BIBLE, THE (4,000 BC - 150 AD)

To Adam he said, "Because you listened to your wife and from the tree about which I commanded you, 'You must not eat of it,' cursed is the ground because of you; through painful toil you will eat of it all the days of your life." -- Genesis 3:17

"Better to live on a corner of the roof than share a house with a quarrelsome wife." -- Proverbs 21:9

"Better to live in a desert than with a quarrelsome and ill-tempered wife." -- Proverbs 21:19

"I find more bitter than death the woman who is a snare, whose heart is a trap and whose hands are chains. The man who pleases God will escape her, but the sinner she will ensnare." -- Ecclesiastes 7:26

"...while I was still searching but not finding - I found one upright man among a thousand, but not one upright woman among them all." -- Ecclesiastes 7:28

"O My people! Their oppressors are children,
And women rule over them.
O My people! Those who guide you lead you astray
And confuse the direction of your paths." -- Isaiah 3:12

---

Jeremiah 44
15 Then all the men who were aware that their wives were burning sacrifices to other gods, along with all the women who were standing by, as a large assembly, including all the people who were living in Pathros in the land of Egypt, responded to Jeremiah, saying,

16 "As for the message that you have spoken to us in the name of the LORD, we are not going to listen to you!

17 "But rather we will certainly carry out every word that has proceeded from our mouths, by burning sacrifices to the queen of heaven and pouring out drink offerings to her, just as we ourselves, our forefathers, our kings and our princes did in the cities of Judah and in the streets of Jerusalem; for then we had plenty of food and were well off and saw no misfortune.

18 "But since we stopped burning sacrifices to the queen of heaven and pouring out drink offerings to her, we have lacked everything and have met our end by the sword and by famine."

---

³²"I want you to be free from anxieties. The unmarried man is anxious about the things of the Lord, how to please the Lord. ³³But the married man is anxious about worldly things, how to please his wife, ³⁴and his interests are divided." -- 1 Corinthians 7:32-34

“I permit no woman to teach or have authority over men; she is to keep silent. 13For Adam was formed first, then Eve; 14and Adam was not deceived, but the woman was deceived and became a transgressor.” -- 1 Timothy 2:12-14
.

***************************************************************

BROWNMILLER, SUSAN (1935 - )

"[Rape] is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear." -- Susan Brownmiller, Against Our Will, p.6

"Man's discovery that his genitalia could serve as a weapon to generate fear must rank as one of the most important discoveries of prehistoric times, along with the use of fire, and the first crude axe stone." -- Susan Brownmiller

****************************************************************

CHESLER, PHYLLIS (1940 - )

"[M]ost mother-women give up whatever ghost of a unique and human self they may have when they 'marry' and raise children." -- Phyllis Chesler, Women and Madness, p.294

---------------------------

Also on Chesler:

Family Make-over Ponzi Scheme, by Carey Roberts

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/060307

*****************************************************************

CHURCHILL, SIR WINSTON (1874 - 1965)

"The power of the Executive to cast a man into prison without formulating any charge known to the law, and particularly to deny him the judgment of his peers, is in the highest degree odious and is the foundation of all totalitarian government whether Nazi or Communist." -- Sir Winston Churchill

***************************************************************

CLARKE, CHERYL

"Heterosexuality is a die-hard custom through which male-supremacist institutions insure their own perpetuity and control over us. Women are kept, maintained and contained through terror, violence, and the spray of semen...[Lesbianism is] an ideological, political and philosophical means of liberation of all women from heterosexual tyranny... " -- Cheryl Clarke, "Lesbianism, An Act of Resistance," in This Bridge Called My Back: Writing by Radical Women of Color

***************************************************************

CLINTON, BILL (1946 - )

"We can't be so fixated on our desire to preserve the rights of ordinary Americans..." -- Bill Clinton

****************************************************************

CLINTON, HILLARY (1947 - )

"It takes a village to raise a child." -- Hillary Clinton

“Many of you are well enough off that the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good.” -- Hillary Clinton

“Research shows the presence of women raises the standards of ethical behavior and lowers corruption.” -- Hillary Clinton

“In many parts of the world, women and girls are especially vulnerable to HIV/AIDS because they lack control over most aspects of their life. Cultural expectations and gender roles expose women and girls to violence, sexual exploitation and far greater risk for infection.” -- Hillary Clinton

“We must stop thinking of the individual and start thinking about what is best for society.” -- Hillary Clinton

"Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat." -- Hillary Clinton

“The American people are tired of liars and people who pretend to be something they're not.” -- Hillary Clinton

****************************************************************

COMMINS, CATHERINE

"Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometime gain from the experience," -- Catherine Comins, Vassar College Assistant Dean of Student Life in Time.

******************************************************************

COOPER, JILLY

"The male is a domestic animal which, if treated with firmness...can be trained to do most things." -- Jilly Cooper, SCUM (Society For Cutting Up Men, started by Valerie Solanas)

******************************************************************

CRONAN, SHEILA

"It became increasingly clear to us that the institution of marriage `protects' women in the same way that the institution of slavery was said to `protect' blacks--that is, that the word `protection' in this case is simply a euphemism for oppression," -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 214.

"Marriage is a form of slavery." -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 216.

"Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the Women's Movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage." -- Sheila Cronan, "Marriage," in Koedt, Levine, and Rapone, eds., Radical Feminism, p. 219.

*******************************************************************

DALY, MARY (1928 - )

"If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males." -- Mary Daly, former Professor at Boston College, 2001

Excerpt from Wikipedia about Mzzzz. Daly's career:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Daly

Daly refused to admit male students to any of her classes at Boston College on the grounds that their presence inhibited class discussion. According to Daly, Women's Studies classes with men in them become "dumbed down."

.
Boston College consistently reprimanded Daly, claiming that her actions were in violation of title IX of federal law requiring the College to ensure that no person was excluded from an education program on the basis of sex, and of the University's own non-discrimination policy insisting that all courses be open to both male and female students.

.
In 1998, a discrimination claim against the college by two male students was backed by the Center for Individual Rights, a conservative advocacy group. Following further reprimand, Daly absented herself from classes rather than admit the male students.[1] Boston college removed her tenure rights, citing a verbal agreement by Daly to retire. She brought suit against the College disputing violation of her tenure rights and claiming she was forced out against her will, but her request for injunction was denied by Middlesex Superior Court, Judge Martha Sosman.[2]

.
An out-of-court settlement was reached in which Daly agreed that she had retired from her faculty position.[3] However, Daly maintains that Boston College had wronged her students by depriving her of her right to teach freely.[4] She documented her account of the events in the 2006 book Amazon Grace.
.
******************************************************************
.
DA VINCI, LEONARDO
.

.
"Marriage is like putting your hand into a bag of snakes in the hope of pulling out an eel." -- Leonardo da Vinci
.
*******************************************************************
.

DENNIS, WENDY

"For one of the implicit, if unadmitted, tenets of feminism has been a fundamental disrespect for men." -- Wendy Dennis

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

The Tyranny of Tolerance - by Robert H. Dierker

I found this while over at MRA Revolutionary's Blog. http://mamonaku187.blogspot.com/

I had heard of the book & of Robert Dierker, but I had never read any of it yet.

Excerpt:

• Why do the courts claim the power to tax us?

• Why is a Christian fired when he voices opposition to his employer’s favoring homosexuals?

• Why are airline pilots sued and sent to “diversity training” for recommending that suspicious-looking people of Middle Eastern appearance be kept off planes?

• Why does a judge who defends a monument to the Ten Commandments in a courthouse lose his job?

• Why are speech codes imposed on employers, university students, lawyers (and judges!), while “artistic” indecency is protected from even the mildest regulation?

• Why are peaceful abortion protesters thrown in jail, their right to free speech crushed?

• Why are white and Asian students denied admission to colleges and universities in the name of “diversity”?

• Why is an enemy fighter captured in Afghanistan granted access to U.S. federal courts, overturning judicial precedent safeguarding the president’s wartime powers—to say nothing of common sense?

---

Read much, much more:

The Tyranny of Tolerance

Chapter 1: The Cloud Cuckooland of Radical Feminism

http://www.ebooks.com/ebooks/book_display.asp?IID=274156

Wow! I think this guy is even more pissed off about this nonsense than I am!

But then again, we should all be furious that bullshit like this has been happening right under our noses:

"Differences [between men and women], including the products of social inequality, make unequal treatment not unequal at all." -- Catharine MacKinnon, "Reflections on Sex Equality Under Law," Yale Law Journal, 1991

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, March 19, 2007

A Nation of Frogs

This piece is well worth the read... what else are you going to do? Watch some man-hatred on TV?

A Nation of Frogs - by William Borst, Ph. D. American History

http://www.mindszenty.org/report/2003/mr_0103.pdf

------------------------------------------------------------------------

As the great philosopher Rob Fedders sees it, the real enemies we face are in ideas.

1 - The Personal is the Political

2 - The Truth is Relative

How different would the world be without these ideas?

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

"The philosophers have only interpreted the world in different ways. The point, however, is to change it." -- Karl Marx

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

How's this for a philosophy to change the world?

Television is the real opiate of the people.

*****************************************************************

Useful Idiot Quote of the Day: ?...??...???

Qu'est-ce qui se passe? I maintain that if I don't get at least one insulting comment per day that I am just not doing my job.

I apologize. I will have to pick it up a notch.

Sorry, dear readers, but for today you will have to settle for me plucking one out of thin air.

Therefore, I bring to you...

The Useful Idiot Quote of All Time:

Maxine Waters, Democrat, US House of Representatives, said:

"I HAVE TO MARCH BECAUSE MY MOTHER COULD NOT HAVE AN ABORTION!"
http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/040506

Oh, but that's not all... this Useful Idiot is full of great quotes, as most politicians are. Here are a few more:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxine_Waters

"The objection is in writing, and I don't care that it isn't signed by a member of the Senate." (December 2000, on her objection to the Presidential Election in 2000), to which Al Gore responded "The chair would advise that the rules do care."

"George W Bush, go to hell! And while you’re at it, we want you to take Ashcroft with you. And don’t forget Rumsfeld. And please carry along Condi Rice. . . I have to march because my mother could not have an abortion." (at the televised March for Women's Lives march, Washington D.C., April 24, 2005) [1]

"I don't see white police officers slamming the heads of little white boys into police cars."[10]

(And of course, as usual):

Alleged Corruption
In January 2006, Waters was named as one of the twenty most corrupt members of Congress in the Beyond Delay report[8], commissioned by the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington. The report accused the Congress member of abusing her position for the benefit of her family. Her family members earned more than $1 million through business deals involving companies she had been in direct connection.[9]

---

Aha, but you think we are done?

Oh no, there is more. Mzzzz Waters, a public servant and pronounced feminist goes above and beyond with her determination to fully earn her wages, as is illustrated with her help in the feminization of Title IX.

Maxine Waters is referenced on page 10 of this PDF from the IWF in regard to her flouting of the Quie Amendment, attached by Congress to Title IX. The Quie Amendment expressely forbade the use of Gender Quotas in regard to Title IX. (Also described on page 10)

From: Time Out For Fairness (Women For Title IX Reform) - from the Independent Women's Forum (PDF)

http://www.iwf.org/pdf/fairness.pdf

"...a legislative markup in 1997 changed everything. During a House Subcommittee debate over the legislative intentions of Title IX, Representative Maxine Waters (D-CA) rejected Representative Charles Canady's (R-FL) reminder of the Quie Amendment, declaring, "Title IX is the biggest quota you've ever seen. It is fifty-fifty. It is a big round quota." Her statement was a big harbinger of future judicial opinions that would change the course of Title IX significantly."

---

Little people like this pose a threat to feminism:

An 11-week old fetus that likely would have had something more intelligent to contribute to the world than Mzzzz. Waters.

Could the United Nations have had "Other" Reasons for the Global Warming Armageddon Report?

http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/un_monitor/in_our_opinion/global_taxes.htm

Global Taxes Are Back, Watch Your Wallet - posted Aug. 12, 2004 at CFIF.ORG

Excerpt from the article:

"A tax on fossil fuels like gasoline, coal, oil and natural gas. This plan, usually called a Carbon Tax, would drive up the price of gas for cars and trucks, home heating fuels, plastics, and countless other products. Proponents argue that such a tax would combat global warming by discouraging the use of fossil fuels while the revenue from such a tax could be redistributed to poorer nations. One U.N. paper suggested that such a tax would yield $125 billion per year with U.S. taxpayers stuck for more than $25 billion of that tab. But even supporters acknowledge that the modest tax that they would initially propose would not reduce greenhouse gasses or even slow the use of fossil fuels. In order to achieve that policy goal, the tax rate would have to be very high — enough to generate $750 billion per year, of which U.S. taxpayers would pay more $150 billion."

Read the article and find out about the U.N.'s proposed E-mail Tax, Currency Transaction Tax, International Airline Tax & Aviation Fuel Tax - all on top of the above Carbon Tax.

Total up all the money they trying to tax from the world & you will come to figures from $550 Billion/yr to above $1 TRILLION a year.

Gee... but Rob, nobody's ever lied, intimidated, or broken the law to get money before.

That the U.N. has the potential to be the LARGEST financial recipient from Global Warming Hysteria should not be ignored!

These men and others should be allowed to speak their piece to the world and we can go from there, after ALL the facts are on the table:

The Great Global Warming Swindle
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4520665474899458831&q=Global+Warming+Swindle

Follow the money...

Read the entire Article Here: http://www.cfif.org/htdocs/freedomline/un_monitor/in_our_opinion/global_taxes.htm

When was the last time YOU voted for your U.N. Representative?

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains." -- Herbert Hoover

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

*******************************************************************

Useful Idiot Quote of the Day (in response to "Marxofeminists are Cat Lovers):

Anonymous 12:04pm said...
Dude, I don't know what bug crawled up your ass and died there, but it must have gotten ahold of something good. First off, being a straight white male, let me inform you that just because a woman wants to work, wants the same opportunities and treatment as a man, and wants to be independant, doesn't mean that the whole world as we know it is coming to an end. All they want is the same opportunity in life that men get. Just because you can't get some anymore because of your chauvanistic attitude doesn't mean that the concept of 'family' will die. Women are not objects, Women are not things. They are human beings, they are people, and they have wants and needs and feelings of their own. They are not here just to serve males and should NEVER be treated like slaves as you suggest they should in your 'T.V. Repairman' post... You sir are sick, demented, and in severe need of a major attitude adjustment, and I'm more than willing to provide it...

---

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/050823

"It's not just the feminist propaganda mill that endlessly replays the woman-as-victim mantra. Chivalrous men, acting out their fantasies of the White Knight in Shining Armor, are guilty as well."

Thursday, March 15, 2007

The Marxist Creep Has a Speed Limit

http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070311/UPDATE/703110354/1148/AUTO01

A Speed Limit for the German Autobahn?

No way say German drivers! Even so, Germany is under increasing pressure to impose a speed limit on this highway by environmental groups. Can they hold off and continue to resist? I don't know, but I sure hope so.

"There are so many areas in which we waste energy in a completely senseless way and burden the climate," EU Environment Commissioner Stavros Dimas told the Bild am Sonntag newspaper."

A simple measure in Germany could be a general speed limit on highways," he added, according to the newspaper. "Speed limits make a lot of sense for many reasons and are completely normal in most EU states, as in the U.S.A. — only in Germany, strangely, is it controversial."

I encourage anyone who hasn't yet done so to read my piece "What is Marxism and How Does It Work."

http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-is-marxism-and-how-does-it-work.html

"...This is the 3-step brainwashing technique of how to change personal values: 1 - UNFREEZING from the present level of acceptence, 2 - MOVING the subject to the next level, 3 - FREEZING the subject at the new level until proper acceptance occurs. (Repeat until the desired destruction occurs.)"

What has all happened in the past while?

1). The UN came out with an "Armageddon Report" about Global Warming, insisting it is man-made, despite multitudes of qualified nay-sayers who were silenced from speaking out!

We are going to DIE if we don't act NOW!

This is the "unfreezing."

2). The EU Environment Commissioner (not the German Gov't) comes out and subverts the sovereignty of the German people "in the name of the greater good."

And of course, it is not a big deal. It is only a miserable speed limit... it is safer... it will save you money... it's for the environment. We've got to save the earth! Think of your children... you've got to do it for them.

It's only a small thing.

This is the moving to the next level.

3). It is only a small thing, isn't it? And there are benefits, aren't there?

But, the people of Germany will be "accepting" of the fact that they have to sacrifice for the "greater good." And they are sacrificing to someone who they did not elect as their representative - to people that aren't even Germans.

They will leave it at this level for a while, until the people accept that this is the way to "Fight Global Warming." They will accept that forces outside of their own country will tell them what to do - It IS only a small thing, isn't it?

This is the "freezing" at the new level until proper acceptance occurs.

----------

I wonder if the push will come for ALL speed limits around the world to be lowered to 80km/hr, as that is the most fuel efficient.

Watch Out!

Wednesday, March 14, 2007

Things Like This Make It All Worthwhile!

Hawaiian Libertarian's Blog

http://hawaiianlibertarian.blogspot.com/

Welcome to the fray!

The food sucks, but the company is good.

Monday, March 12, 2007

The Great Global Warming Swindle

Please, take time to watch this very important video. (1hr 15min)

Spot the Marxism!

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4520665474899458831&q=Global+Warming+Swindle

GET MAD!

SPEAK OUT!

CALL YOUR POLITICIANS AND TELL THEM THAT THEY, ENVIRONMENTALISTS AND FEMINISTS WILL ALL BE SENT WAY UP NORTH TO MONITOR GLOBAL WARMING UP-CLOSE!

CARE OF THE ANGRY PEOPLE WHO ARE BECOMING ENLIGHTENED!

Rotten Filthy Marxists!

----------------------------------------------------------------

Next Morning Update!

This exceptionally well done video has suddenly & mysteriously "disappeared."

I will hunt around and see if I can find it somewhere else. This video didn't just challenge global warming - it thoroughly destroyed the fools promoting global warming.

Read this article about the video:

http://www.lse.co.uk/ShowStory.asp?story=CZ434669U&news_headline=global_warming_is_lies_claims_documentary

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is another copy of the video:

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-4520665474899458831&q=Global+Warming+Swindle

Miserable Marxo-bastards.

Here it is through You-Tube as well (in 8 parts)

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=global+warming+swindle&search=Search

The truth will set you free.

March 13, 2007 - The 1st Annual "Throw Out Your TV Day."

On a Lighter Note...

The legitimacy of the National Organization of Men Against Amazonian Masterhood (No Ma'am) continues to grow with the arrival of two new features:

1). The Ballad of No Ma'am:

http://www.eebell.net/mwc/nomaam.mp3

Hah! Try to top that, Marxofeminist F.A.N.G.'s! (Feminists Against Neanderthal Guys)

No Ma'am's very own Anti-feminist Anthem!

Yee-haw!

2). The No Ma'am Charter:

Saturday, March 10, 2007

Laughing My Ass Off!

Captain Zarmband has a You-Tube video posted at his site that is hilarious.

It is a 911 recording of Uccelline, from a Cuckoo's Nest, demanding that the State come on over and practice a little totalitarianism on her behalf, because she is a member of the Pink Proletariat.

http://dhdiary.blogspot.com/2007/03/priceless-just-priceless.html

Lol!

I know it's not nice to pick on people who are "politically challenged," like Uccelline & her clucking flock, but...

I am annoyed that she picked a fight with the MRM and accused us of all sorts of things, then when I answered her arguments IN SPADES, with irrefutable evidence, she said that I was just trying to get attention and started banning my comments.

Totalitarianists cannot function without widespread use of censorship. And they certainly haven't got a hope in hell of being able to put forth a conscise argument in defence of their supremacist notion of "greater good," or rather "freedom through slavery."

http://abirdsnest.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/guilty-pleasures/

http://abirdsnest.wordpress.com/2007/02/17/responses-to-the-commenters-on-the-guilty-pleasures-post/

My responses:

http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/02/what-is-marxism-and-how-does-it-work.html

http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/02/all-gender-wage-gap-arguments-lead-to.html

I know that I've already plucked the wings off the fly that is Uccelline, but I see some people from her twisted little coven are still surfing on over here to read.

What I would like to point out, is how truly EVIL people like Uccelline are - and how completely damaging it is for society to allow these nonsensical people to continue with this twisted charade. When confronted with irrefutable evidence that she is pushing a fully Marxist agenda, she prefers to silence not with an intelligent rebuttal, but rather with insults and shaming talk - and absolutely refuses to acknowledge she has been a useful idiot advocating for a truly sinister plot.

She is not "misguided."

She knows what the score is.

And she has no intention of stopping, in spite of the evidence before her.

Pure Evil!

Yes, this fly has no more wings, but I may keep it around so I can play with it from time to time.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

Dr. Fruitfly Gets His Ass Handed to Him on a Naturally Chilled Canadian Platter

I know that we usually bitch and moan about fembots, but I think it's really important for us to step back for a moment and recognize that there is something bigger going on here than just feminism attacking Western Civilization. And no, I am not going to try and tell you about Freemasonry or the Protocols of Zion or something like that. If you are interested in that, there are plenty of sites out there that pay lots of attention to such theories. "Save the Males" is a good place start: http://www.savethemales.ca/ What we really have to start acknowledging, however, is that this battle is far bigger than just feminism.

Is it a conspiracy?

Who cares!

If you knew that a bunch of men got together under the guise of something called the "Manhatten Project" to develop a device that would cause untold physical destruction on Earth, then studied it a little bit to find out about it - and then noticed that your neighbor was carting detonation devices and weapons grade uranium into his garage, would you give a crap if he was part of a conspiracy?

And herein lies the truth: 21 men who were experts on psychology, sexology, politics and a variety of other academic practices were chosen to study together at the Marxist's Frankfurt School. They spent a decade intensely studying the specific question of how to destroy a society! They set about to discover how to create a "social nuclear bomb." That this was their intention is of no doubt, as even a cursory investigation by a newcomer to the whole idea of Cultural Marxism will resoundingly reveal this as fact - along with their specified targets and their plans on how to destroy them. This is not conspiracy "theory" - this is verifiable fact.

Therefore, when we look around in society and see the very targets these men identified being attacked in the precise manner these men suggested would be the most effective in destroying them... well, who cares if it is a conspiracy! All the elements for the Social Nuclear Bomb are being put together and we should be not just be suspicious - We should be alarmed and jolted into action!

So, I would just like to point out that the Cultural Marxism we face with feminism is exactly the same enemy that presents itself in other areas of our society like multiculturalism, anti-religiousness and even environmentalism. Yes, Rob wipes his ass with spotted owls! The fact is however, that when one starts researching the environmental movement, we see that they are using the same tactics that feminists use. EXACTLY! That many environmentalists preach that in order to save the environment we must abolish private property should definitely make your commie-sense start to tingle.

Let's also remember that in the 1970's we were going to die from Global Cooling, and in the 80's & 90's the hole in Ozone Layer was going to fry us, and then the push came on to tell the world that Global Warming is going to wipe us out. These people are pushing a Marxist agenda and are using the same "half-truth" methods we are so familiar with in regard to feminism.

Recently the United Nations held their conference on Global Warming and decided that it was certainly man-made.

There are not just one or two scientists who refute this nonsense, but there are THOUSANDS of them. They, however, don't get reported on in the media, just like men's voices never get heard in regard to the "battle of the sexes." They are fighting the same war as us - and they deserve our support!

John Christy, a climatologist from the University of Alabama is just one of the many thousands.

http://www.reason.com/news/show/34939.html

"But University of Alabama at Huntsville climatologist John Christy, a climate expert on whom I have relied for years, makes some interesting observations about the Arctic Council's report. "If you look at the long term records, the Arctic has been as warm or warmer than it is today," says Christy. He cites temperature data from the Hadley Centre in the UK showing that from 70 degrees north latitude to the pole, the warmest years on record in the Arctic were 1937 and 1938. This area is just slightly above the Arctic Circle.

Furthermore, those same records show that the Arctic warmed twice as fast between 1917 and 1937 as it has in the past 20 years. After 1940, the Arctic saw a big cool-down and climatologists noted sea ice expanding in the northern Atlantic. Christy argues that what he calls the Great Climate Shift occurred in the late 1970s and caused another sudden warming in the Arctic. Since the late 1970s there has not been much additional warming in the region at all. In fact, on page 23, the Arctic Council Assessment offers very similar data for Arctic temperature trends from 60 degrees north latitude—the area that includes most of Alaska and essentially all of Greenland, most of Norway and Sweden, and the bulk of Russia.

Interestingly, the recent increase in temperatures in Alaska and Siberia seem to have coincided almost simultaneously with a shift in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) in the late 1970s. Could this be part of Christy's Great Climate Shift? Swings in the PDO occur on 30 to 40 year time frames, and the most recent one brought warmer currents flowing north to the coast of Alaska. The Assessment does note that "several important natural modes of variability that especially affect the Arctic have been identified, including the Arctic Oscillation, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and the North Atlantic Oscillation. Each of these can affect the regional patterns of such features as the intensity and tracks of storm systems, the direction of prevailing winds, the amount of snow, and the extent of sea ice."

That paints quite a different story from the ceaseless left wing media bombardment that we have recently been forced to endure here in Canada. I don't know how it was reported elsewhere in the world, but here it was as important as if an asteroid were going crash into earth tomorrow morning. All of the media told us how we could better save the environment and made a huge deal out of it.

I decided to solve the environmental problem by turning off the TV.

It really is horseshit. Check out this site from the late John Daly, a men who dedicated himself to fighting these lying turkeys, much as we dedicate ourselves to fighting the stupidity of feminism. Mr. Daly, by the way, concludes over and over that environmentalism is entirely politically motivated and has little to do with actual concern about the environment. Just like how we all know that feminism has nothing to do with "equality."

http://www.john-daly.com/

This whole site is filled with great info, but the first thing you see which is quite striking is this picture:

The 1841 sea level benchmark (centre) on the `Isle of the Dead', Tasmania. According to Antarctic explorer, Capt. Sir James Clark Ross, it marked mean sea level in 1841. Photo taken at low tide 20 Jan 2004.Mark is 50 cm across; tidal range is less than a metre. © John L. Daly.

Yes indeed, in 166 years the earth has warmed to such incredible levels that the ocean most certainly is rising!

WHERE ARE MY WATER WINGS?

Of course, Canada's biggest Eco-Warrior is Dr. Fruitfly, David Suzuki - or Dr. Suskooki. This man is an asshole in the first degree, and coming from a pretty big asshole such as Rob Fedders, who even once met the man, that says a lot!

Of course, Suskooki is a major supporter of Canada adhering to the Kyoto Protocol. Something that is truly stupid and which the new Conservative Government rightly reneged on. Kyoto would completety destroy Canada's economy - but of course, why would a Marxist give a shit about that? Those promoting Kyoto have been forced to admit that even if all of the goals of Kyoto somehow could be met, it would only cause 1/2 of one degree of difference after 20 years - and they admit it is just a starting point for all of the radical changes that must take place. If you start reading what these guys want, you will find them advocating for revolutionary change and a new kind of human in tune with the environment.

Marxism!

Here is something interesting about Dr. Fruitfly which illustrates in spades how much environmentalists behave exactly like feminists. From "Angry in the Great White North:"

The Poll David Suzuki Doesn't Want You to See

http://stevejanke.com/archives/217705.php

---

And of course, David Suzuki is not above targeting children with his biased, false messages - kind of like... who were those people again... they have vaginas & funny haircuts...

David Suzuki vs. a Terrorist: A Difference of Degree

http://stevejanke.com/archives/217230.php

---

Yes, Steve Janke from "Angry in the Great White North" despises this man about as much as I do:

According to David Suzuki, Kyoto Targets are Always Achievable

http://stevejanke.com/archives/217703.php

GIVE 'EM HELL STEVE!

(Applause!)

---

I tell you, this whole Global Warming Hoopla we've been subjected to by the United Nations and the MSM smacks of a couple of other hoaxes we are familiar with:

http://no-maam.blogspot.com/2007/02/lest-we-forget-super-bowl-sunday-hoax.html

and,

http://manhatred.blogspot.com/2007/02/thousands-of-women-trafficked-for-sex.html

Let's not let ourselves get blinkered into thinking we are the only ones out there! The question is, why are there so many people who are fighting Cultural Marxism who cannot seem to ally themselves together in an effort to get rid of this evil in our society.

------------------------------------------------------------

Lol! More people who are pissed off at Dr. Fruitfly:

My First Hand Encounter with That Obnoxious Twat, David Suzuki
http://shaidle.blogmatrix.com/:entry:shaidle-2007-03-07-0016/

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

The Solution to Save Western Civilization: A New Nation in Western Canada

1 - The seeds of separatism already exist in Western Canada and flares up from time to time – especially in retaliation to Quebec’s constant threats of separation (every dozen years or so, since Confederation – likely arising again within the next year or so), and Ottawa’s constant placating of Quebec with a disproportionate transfer of wealth payments – coming in large part from Western Canada. Quebec has been like a snivelling wife who does not pull her weight, yet continually threatens to leave and destroy the entire household if her demands are not met. Just as a man should do with a harpy wife who displays such mannerisms, Canada should throw Quebec to the curb rather than placate her. If Eastern Canada is continually so pussy-whipped by Quebec, then Western Canada should not hesitate to throw the rest of Canada to the curb along with Quebec. Given the near separation of Quebec from Canada in the mid 1990’s, the precedent has already been set for a system of secession from Canada based on voter democracy and not civil war.

Check out the results of “Western Canada Separatism” on Google:

http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=Western+Canada+Separatism&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

2 - Western Canada already possesses a similar political mentality of Conservatism/Smaller Government/Family values. In Canada it is well known that the West “is the Right.” This plays along well with what would need to be done in order to create a new legal system which would honour the basic unit of society – the traditional family.

3 - Western Canada would be an instantly viable state. Population would be around 11 million or so; Infrastructure is already in place, and Western Canada could easily practice isolationism from the rest of the world’s increasing globalization. There is more than enough resources in the form of oil/natural gas, agricultural land, mining resources, timber, 3 ocean coasts with 2 developed Pacific ports in Vancouver, BC & Prince Rupert, BC, a developed Atlantic port in Churchill, MB, as well as developed rail & roadway systems to bring products to port. Western Canada would also automatically control the increasingly important Northwest Passage through the Arctic, effectively negating the need to use the Panama Canal.

4 - Separatism could rid ourselves of the Marxist inspired Multiculturalism that deeply divides the country based on differing languages/cultures and utilize the opportunity to build a new nation built on the “melting pot” rather than the “cultural mosaic.” The cultural mosaic is insane, and the strength of diversity is a Left wing myth. Places like the former Yugoslavia & the Middle East have ceaseless turmoil because of cultural “diversity.” Why would any sane nation model themselves on those systems? Unless, of course, the goal was to create conflict…hmmm?

5 - An opportunity would automatically present itself to “re-write” a new Constitution and a new Charter of Rights which thoroughly denounces the Hegelian Dialectic and embraces the ideals of inalienable rights bound securely to “immoveable” documents such as the US Constitution and the US Bill of Rights. A new country in Western Canada would also be able to instantly solve the insane system of non-elected senators that has afflicted Canada since Confederation and would also allow us to start a new political system of “direct representation” on both the levels of MP’s and the Prime Minister. It is wrong that we are voting for a party rather than the individual. We should be allowed to vote for our MP’s separately from our Prime Minister, as both are direct representatives of our individual concerns.

6 – We would be presented with the opportunity to develop a new monetary currency based on the credit of our new nation’s name (The United Provinces of Fedders – The UPF), rather than the gold standard & the insane privately controlled central banking/fractional reserve system. Nobel Prize winning economist, Milton Friedman, has proposed how to work such a system. Friedman speculated that the new currency would stabilize quickly and that without the involvement of corrupt banking practices, the National Debt could be paid off in a matter of years. According to Friedman, the monetary value of the nation’s currency would quickly stabilize in accordance to the strength of the economy & the nation’s resources, much like a private individual’s credit when borrowing from a regular bank. We would then be able to set our own national lending rates at a fixed percentage and have a prosperous economy based on predictability – one where hard work and ingenuity would pay off rather than luck.

7 - Releasing ourselves from the current banking system would allow us to pay off our share of the Canadian Debt, which we would graciously accept – and should be somewhat lower per capita than the whole of Canada, given Eastern Canada’s propensity to rob the West of our riches & re-invest it in the East, while disproportionately lacking to re-invest those Marxist “equalization payments” back into the West. BC, Alberta & Ontario are the only 3 provinces that are consistently profitable and rich, yet the riches of BC & Alberta have always been used to fund the development of eastern “have-not” provinces.

8 - Freeing ourselves from the National Debt would enable “breathing room” for the dire economic situation that the feminist inspired unsustainable birthrate presents for the future. Without the debt and with practising some smart economics based on isolationism and traditional “honest day’s work/honest day’s pay,” we would not be required to take in massive amounts of multicultural immigrants from the Third World to artificially prop up the population in order to maintain the GDP growth rate we currently need to pay our burdensome debt. We would possibly have the luxury to choose immigration from other Western World countries that share a similar history, language & other cultural similarities that would enable easy assimilation into our new “melting pot.” This would possibly offset the demographic problems presented by the 20 year “generation gap of change” we are facing as a direct cause of feminized policies.

9 - Freeing ourselves from the National Debt would allow ourselves to establish a simple, sane & fair consumption based flat taxation system. Perhaps a 15% flat tax similar to the one that resulted in Hong Kong becoming an economic powerhouse.

10 - A new country would not yet be part of the United Nations; therefore, we would not need to join the United Nations. Should the UN decide to apply pressure to join via sanctions, Western Canada could easily survive in isolationist luxury given the factors described above in point #3. Furthermore, could the UN, the USA, Eastern Canada, or the North American Union protest too loudly at a New Country that was directly based on the American Constitution & democracy? Erm… wasn’t the point of the war in Iraq to bring such a form of government to the Middle East? If the only thing they were pissed off about was that we would not join the UN or adhere to NAFTA/the NAU, well, I don’t think it would lead to violence. They could try to impose economic warfare upon us, but there are few places in the world that could easily adapt to long term economic isolation as efficiently and as luxuriously as we could. We could live for a thousand years on our massive supplies of food, oil, metals, timber, energy, etc. Western Canada is set up for exportation of truly immense amounts of resources, and if turned inward it could completely do away with the need to be a part of the rest of the world. Piss off then. Lol! An embargo on us like the one on Cuba would be a joke. If we withheld our oil from Alberta alone we could do some major damage in retaliation, but why bother withholding it. It’s still for sale, for $250/barrel. We’ll just pull a DeBeers. With the way the Middle East is shaping up, Western Canada will soon become the Western World’s #1 source of oil. I believe we are already #2 supplier to the US after Saudi Arabia, (Maybe #3?), and we have hardly begun to tap into the vastness of the oil sands.

11 – Defensive military services from a small population can easily be provided by a similar program to Switzerland’s or a plethora of other countries, where there is a mandatory 1 year service upon Highschool graduation for young men, followed up with bi-annual militia training refreshers for all men from 19 to 40 years old, who are required to keep their army rifles in their homes and already know the “general plan” and where to convene when the sirens sound. As the Middle East has vividly shown to us, it is scary business for foreign entities to stick their nose into a place where everybody you see has the potential to kill you.

12 – And finally, all of those islands way up in the Arctic currently need to be patrolled by us in order to maintain that we do indeed have sovereignty over them. I propose to kill two birds with one stone, in the traditional Canadian, non-violent way. We could start by offering the first ever feminist-only University in Nunavut Territory. Yes, by building the University of Nunavut, we will be showing our “commitment” to feminists, and of course that should allow us to say that since there is an entire university dedicated to feminism, we can now justify pulling the plug on ALL other funding of Women’s Studies for the rest of our Academic Institutions and get back to teaching our kids to be humans, rather then zombie like Fembots. Of course, once a feminist gets her BS in Fembot, there will be a network of DV Shelters strategically placed throughout the Arctic islands for them to “work” at. See how this works? A lot of places up there are just ice too, so for troublesome Fembots, we could just build a DV Shelter on an icefloe (they won’t know if there’s land underneath in the Arctic winter) and when the spring comes… bye bye!

Anyway, it’s really not a joke that Western Canada may separate one day. Quebec is already jockeying for a separatist push AGAIN in the next election, and nothing gets the people in Western Canada (who now greatly outnumber Quebecers) riled up more than watching Ottawa kiss Quebec’s French ass at the expense of kicking us Westerners in the balls yet again.

Here is a poll from the summer of 2005:
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/1123588600678_121/?hub=Canada

"The magazine's survey found that 35.6 per cent of respondents from Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia agreed that "Western Canadians should begin to explore the idea of forming their own country."

The poll claims that Albertans, at 42 per cent, were most likely to consider independence, followed by Saskatchewan at 31.9 per cent.

"Westerners are very frustrated with their position in Confederation," said Faron Ellis, a political science professor at Lethbridge Community College, who conducted the survey.

Ellis said that separatist sentiment appeared to run highest among young people -- 37 per cent of respondents between the ages of 18 and 29 were open to the notion of breaking away from Canada.

Support was lowest -- 33.7 per cent -- among the baby boom generation aged between 45 and 64."

Lol! And in 2005, it had been a decade since the last Quebec cry-fest - something which REALLY pisses off Western Canucks! And now they’re gearing up to cry “we’re special” again. So who knows what increasing stupidity from the Career Politician Party may increase those poll figures to? But if it were to happen, and with the Right Wing/Pro-Family tendency that already exists the region… if careful consideration were given to a new political & legal system, a solidly based Constitution and Charter of Rights… One day Western Canada may become a “Utopia” for people to live in a modern Western-style Nation without modern Western-style Fembots and their Cultural Marxist Cronies - and the future that death march holds.
.

Saturday, March 03, 2007

The Communist Takeover of America - 45 Declared Goals

http://www.rense.com/general32/americ.htm

The Communist Takeover of America - 45 Declared Goals

Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35 January 10, 1963

Current Communist Goals EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Thursday, January 10, 1963 .

(The following Communist goals have been chosen by Rob Fedders as extremely significant)

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use ["]united force["] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

That's 38/45 that are significant today, most of the other 7 are no longer relevant due to the collapse of the USSR.

Read the entire article with all 45 declared goals here: http://www.rense.com/general32/americ.htm

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

All Gender Wage-Gap Arguments Lead to Totalitarianism

I am assuming we all know that the "$0.76 paid to women for every $1.00 a man earns" argument is a completely distorted statistic which feminists and their political lackies are using as propaganda to fuel their ceaseless battle on males in the war for female gender supremacy/Marxism.

Yet how often do we hear some feminist "useful idiot" spout off that they believe women should get "equal pay for equal work?" It is one thing for us to acknowledge that certain feminists, such as those at "A Bird's Nest Blog" http://abirdsnest.wordpress.com/2007/02/09/guilty-pleasures/ , are truly ignorant people who haven't got a clue what they are talking when they speak of such things. And ignorant is the kindest word for people who rally behind such claims while ignoring that the populace fully supported laws making such discrimination illegal way back in 1963. http://www.eeoc.gov/types/epa.html For those mathematically challenged students chasing after their "BA in Gender Studies," 1963 was 44 years ago - that is twice the length of time your average Gender Studies Graduate has lived. We can go into the historical socio-economic conditions which allowed such imbalanced conditions to arrive on another day... perhaps after you attach yourself to the idea 2007 minus 1963 = 44 years, therefore, you are a moron.

In case you are a feminist, currently enrolled or enthralled in Gender Studies, please read the following pieces to establish that you are indeed a misled "useful idiot:"

http://www.eeoc.gov/types/epa.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Male-female_income_disparity_in_the_USA
http://www.ncpa.org/pub/ba/ba392/ba392.pdf
http://www.ifeminists.net/introduction/editorials/2004/0922.html
http://www.iwf.org/issues/issues_detail.asp?ArticleID=515

Now, it is one thing for the "general population" of feminists to be so glaringly guilty of a lack of facts and history. We have rightly come to not expect much in the way of intelligence and integrity from them. However, standing conspicously out in the open like a naked Debra Lafave at the Boy Scout Jamboree, is the never discussed willingness of prominent politicians to use this distorted "fact" in order to gain votes. Truly a treasonous act.

First, let's establish that when a politician like Canada's Maria Minna, or a US Presidential Candidate like John Kerry or Hillary Clinton, yammers on and on about "$0.76" and the need to do something about it - they know! They know they are lying! If they don't know that what they are campaigning for has been solved over 4 decades ago... then who should? Let's establish that not a squeak of feminist flatulence is emitted from a Presidential Candidate without an army of people researching every fact and detail, and every noise made is carefully crafted by a team of individuals who analyze every aspect of the electorate's psychology in regard to said noises. There are no "mistakes" when you run for leader of the free world!

So what are these people saying to us? They are using the Hegelian Dialectic to establish that the "Truth is Relative" and then they are saying "who says your truth is more real than my truth?" This fact is established by them arguing that something can be done about it, rather than taking a realistic approach and saying: "Men & Women are different, and therefore they make different life-choices which will cause a wage-gap without discrimination being the cause." A simple acknowlegement of this fact would permanently kill the "Wage Gap" argument in a fortnight - But, where is the totalitarianism is that?

So what do the enlightened ones propose can be done to solve the "Wage Gap?" Well, in Canada we have feminist theorists who get on the News and discuss such aspects as passing laws forcing businesses to give "flexi-time" to women so they can juggle having a family and a career. I seen one woman who argued that even the Prime Minister's office & the Canadian Parliament should be forced to adhere to "flexi-time" laws so that more women & single moms can consider running for public office while juggling family duties. (Need I say it? OK, fine then! Being leader of your country is a 24/7 job and your family life certainly and neccessarily suffers from it... YOU MORON!)

Of course, a politician can rally the populace to such a scheme because of "economically disadvantaged single mom's" and the "best interest of the child." That feminists and the government are complicit in creating the bursting "single mom" demographic and therefore, also directly contributed to the widespread poverty of children seen in the typical single mom "family" is something that is competely ignored. Historical revisionism is not known to be a tactic too low for Marxists to stoop to... the end does justify the means, as is common throughout all Marxist social planning.

What are some other solutions to the Wage Gap? Daniel Amneus, in Chapter Two of his book The Garbage Genereation http://fisheaters.com/garbagegeneration.html , chronicles how feminist Carolyn Shaw Bell proposes "a special tax to pay for the welfare benefits of families headed by women, and sufficient to increase these benefits so as to wipe out the income differential between poor children with only a mother and well-off children with two parents. The tax would be levied on all men." Another raving lunatic feminist, Howard University Ph D candidate Martha Sawyer, backs up this theory by speculating that "the cost of these fatherless families should be paid by "the most advantaged category, monied white men." For those of you who think this is some dream-like fantasy, let me remind you that Gudrun Schyman of Sweden's Left Party has proposed such a gender-biased taxation system. http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=468&date=20041005 But who's to say this is not a version of equality? The Truth is Relative... Excuse me for a moment, I feel something coming back up the down pipe.

So, lets have a look at what intervention in the wage-gap "problem" will really look like:

- Currently the "wage gap" is NOT caused by a women working for $15/hr while keeping pace with the man next to her earning $20/hr. The wage gap is caused by the average woman working less hours in a week, women taking time off when they have children, women retiring earlier, and women choosing jobs for "emotional fullfilment" rather than the financial bottom line. THIS is what causes a "wage gap" between men's & women's lifetime income. Period, end of story. Take your Hegelian logic and shove it! This is black and white. If feminists would acknowledge these simple facts, wage-gap arguments would suddenly shift to the question: Is it possible to force "un-natural equalization" upon a situation that is "unequal by natural consequences?" The answer of course, is written in black on a white sheet of paper: NO. It is impossible to create "perfect equillibrium" without the use of totalitarianism - and even then...

- It is safe to assume that no-one forces women to have children - her body, her choice. Therefore all negative (& positive) consequences of her choice are completely her responsibility. Society is relieved of any responsibility for this. If you choose to go out and buy the biggest house in town, but the mortgage payments bite into your "pub money," - is it my responsibility to buy you drinks while I'm an apartment renter?

- If we forced every business to hire 50% women and 50% men, we might go a ways to eliminating the wage gap - as women will also be taking construction, farming, mining, military combat and garbageperson jobs. They will not be choosing what to do with their life however. This is how things worked in the USSR. When you finished highschool, you were told what job you would do for the rest of your life. This is not a stretch. The Liberal Party of Canada recently stated they have a "short-list" for women MP's so as to reach their quota of 33% female MP's. The Liberal Party obviously does not believe in the "free market of voter democracy" at all. But this is the start of the harrowing situation we will get if these "intellectuals" refuse to put Hegelian logic aside for a while.

- One must also realize that mathematically, hiring 50% women and 50% men will still result, over time, in more men being in the workforce than women. Currently women work fulltime while they are single & childless, but there is a natural tendency for women to cut back their commitment to the workplace when children arrive on the scene (her body, her choice, of course). In fact many women wish to only return to the workplace on a part-time basis after taking time off for having children & never fully return to working in the capacity before they had children. This is not patriarchal oppression, but rather women choosing a lifestyle which is in accordance with nature. This phenomena has been displayed in places like Britain, who have discovered that 50/50 gender quotas for entrance into Medical Schooling results in less doctors available to the public, because female doctors tend to pull back out of their professions after a decade or so, whereas male doctors plow right on through until retirement. A mathematical solution to this situation would be to dictate that businesses hire perhaps 60% women and 40% men so that as time erodes on the workplace, the overall the balance works out to a 50/50 "gender balance" in any given 50 year period.

- Now, imagine that in our forced 50% hiring situation, the average woman still puts in less hours a week than her male colleagues. (I don't have the exact figures, but it is something to the tune of full-time women working 10hrs/wk less than full-time men). This will likely happen even more when she figures out garbage collection & combat duty are not glamour jobs. Well! We will still be able to show a wage gap! Yup, men will still earn more. The great Hitlery Clinton proposed her feminist solution to this problem when she put forth the "Paycheck Fairness Act" to the New York Senate. Carey Roberts describes Hillary's proposed act here: http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/050426 "...On April 19 Senator Clinton introduced the so-called Paycheck Fairness Act, a law that would pressure employers to fatten women's paychecks, regardless of the number of hours worked or job qualifications." This is nothing more than saying "each according to his abilities & each according to his needs." Classic Marxist talk! And everytime politicians have previously monkeyed with divorcing financial gain from productivity, it has turned into an economic & social disaster of monumental magnitude. What the hell is this gringa thinking?

- Of course, even if Hillary Clinton's insane Paycheck Fairness ideas were to be enforced, it would still not eliminate the wage gap! Women DO take time off from their life-time career to have children. 5 years off out of your career for the children seems to be about the norm. Let's just say that the average person has a 50 year work-life. 5 years equals 10% of that, therefore, feminists will still argue that there is a wage gap. Add onto that number that women tend to retire earlier than men, by say another 5 years, and now you have a wopping 20% wage gap even though you have previously legislated the work place with gender laws. Well, there is only one solution for this problem: MORE LEGISLATION/TOTALITARIANISM! Yes, the only way to eliminate this aspect of the wage-gap is to force women to go to work immediately after giving birth and forcing women to work the exact same amount of years in their life as men. This also means that women would no longer be allowed to get an education, take 5 years off to have children & then choose to only return to employment on a part-time basis as many women currently do. For such actions would also contribute to the "wage gap."

The entire wage-gap argument also goes directly against core principles of a free enterprise economy. When I hear a feminist yammering on about the need to force businesses to allow flexi-time & provide childcare for women in the workplace, I think the following: If a woman was so valuable to her employer that he could not afford to lose her, he would willingly provide her with those things to keep her! And, if a woman was such a hot-shit commodity to an employer, she would not need to have laws forcing her employer to hire her back after paid maternity leave - he would hire her back immediately because it was in his best financial interest to do so! And, if you force employers to provide such services to women while paying them the exact same wage to a man who does not require such extra benefits... will this not result in a man becoming a "better product for cheaper?" I mean, if a man gets paid $40,000/year and that's it - he stays at the job longer (less training expenses), he does not take absense for a year & leave his employer in a lurch trying to find a temporary 1 year employee (who will require extra training expenses), the man will not add to expensive inefficiency by requiring the employer adheres to his personal schedule, the man will not demand that his employer subsidize the daycare expenses of his children (= $$$), and so on and so on. The logical conclusion to this nonsense is that while both men and women get paid the same, a woman may still cost an employer $10,000/year more than a man! Therefore, by free-enterprise economics, employers will still try to keep more men on staff than women, because in general men will mean profit while women will represent the same profit MINUS expensive benefits based on gender. Men will be a superior product, and even if people don't want to say it, employers will still know just by looking at the bottom line. The only way to get rid of this is for the government to take control of private businesses to ensure "proper" quotas are met, and are not influenced by other factors of mankind and nature!

This is beginning to sound a whole lot like totalitarian Communism, dontcha think? Quickly browse these quotes from prominent feminists and see what they think about women in the workplace:

"No woman should be authorized to stay at home and raise her children. Society should be totally different. Women should not have that choice, precisely because if there is such a choice, too many women will make that one." -- Simone de Beauvoir, "Sex, Society, and the Female Dilemma" Saturday Review, June 14, 1975

"If even 10 percent of American women remain full-time homemakers, this will reinforce traditional views of what women ought to do and encourage other women to become full-time homemakers at least while their children are young... This means that no matter how any individual feminist might feel about childcare and housework, the movement as a whole [has] reasons to discourage full-time homemaking." -- Jane J. Mansbridge, Why We Lost the ERA, p.100

"The care of children ...is infinitely better left to the best trained practitioners of both sexes who have chosen it as a vocation... [This] would further undermine family structure while contributing to the freedom of women." -- Kate Millet, Sexual Politics p.178-179

"In order to raise children with equality, we must take them away from families and communally raise them." Dr. Mary Jo Bane, feminist and assistant professor of education at Wellesley College and associate director of the school's Center for Research on Woman

Do you see the natural progression of the $0.76 argument? Do you wonder why, here in Canada, 2 out of the 3 major political parties are demanding that "State Run Daycare" be a top priority? Do you know who else provided state run daycare for women so they could be "equal" in the workplace? Vladmir Lenin, thats who!

http://www.renewamerica.us/columns/roberts/040116 :
"So in 1918, Lenin introduced a new marriage code that outlawed church ceremonies. Lenin opened state-run nurseries, dining halls, laundries and sewing centers. Abortion was legalized in 1920, and divorce was simplified.

In a few short years, most of the functions of the family had been expropriated by the state. By 1921, Lenin could brag that "in Soviet Russia, no trace is left of any inequality between men and women under law."

All of this nonsense is a direct result of Hegelian logic. Once again, Cultural Marxists have chosen feminist agent provocateurs to start a never ending argument against nature! And it really is an argument against nature, and in fact, a direct assault on the family! Yes, $0.76 is an assault on the family! The entire $0.76 argument completely ignores hypergamy. http://fisheaters.com/gb9.html And this is a big deal. Really, it is. If women's attraction to men is based on hypergamy (logically too, for it supports benefits for the next generation), then to eliminate the wage-gap which results as a natural occurence, will also directly take away a large portion of men's attractiveness to women. It would be similar to offering all the males in the country a state-supplied piece of tail 2.6 times a week and wondering if men will still ask women out on dates. Ask yourself what would happen to marriage, families & future populations if men had all the free pieces of ass they could get their hands on! - Don't have to work, don't have to shower, don't have to be polite... you'll still get laid! Think about all the intricate ramifications to even the smallest aspects of society. It is positively endless - and very destructive.

This is where people should ask why left-wing, yoga practising, bottled water drinking, Green Peace loving, wouldn't eat a turnip unless it is organically grown & raw with dirt still on it, vegetarian-vegan, nature is best HYPOCRITES are so obviously supporting an un-natural form of the family & society. How can human intervention on anything in the natural world be bad, but directly monkeying with the mating habits of humans in an un-natural way is considered to be downright desireable? One has to ask these left-wing useful idiots what they would say if the government intervened in the natural way Bald Eagles mated? What would they say if at the start of government intervention, Bald Eagles were producing 3.9 offspring per female... but after government intervention to help Eagles with reproduction, Eagles were producing only 1.5 offspring per female... and the Eagles were dying out as a result? What would happen? These same leftist hippie freaks would be marching on Washington demanding that the government stop monkeying with nature!

It's really not that hard to imagine mankind as just another animal on the planet, is it? Don't the same leftist hippie freaks demand that we all believe in the Theory of Evolution? Don't they all believe that we are evolved from animals, and in fact, we still are animals? Wouldn't that assumption also demand that we acknowledge we have "mating instincts?" Is it "unfair" in nature that a male of the species chooses a female with the best attributes for passing on his genes, and that the female of the species chooses a male with the best attributes for ensuring the survival of her & her offspring? This does not seem to be a stretch with other animals. Why is it evil in regard to "human animals?" Evil to the point that direct intervention is encouraged! Think about that while you sip your wheat-juice. Feminism is un-natural and continually chooses arguments against nature!

It all makes sense, however, when one recognizes that all things feminist are solidly based in Marxism. It's goals are not "justice" between the genders... it's goal is destruction of the family & capitalism. (The patriarchal family, of course, IS Capitalism http://fisheaters.com/gb3.html ). It wants the system to self-destruct because only after the destruction will mankind rise out of the ashes and realize a "new kind of humanity."

"Women, like men, should not have to bear children... The destruction of the biological family, never envisioned by Freud, will allow the emergence of new women and men, different from any people who have previously existed." -- Alison Jagger - Political Philosophies of Women's Liberation: Feminism and Philosophy (Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co. 1977)

Ah, yes. Marxofeminist Utopia! It is also interesting to note their rabid opposition to religion (Marriage comes from religion, remember. The gov't didn't invent it!). People who believe in religion are freakin nuts, according to feminists like Amanda Marcotte and her cronies. In Communist Russia, people who believed in religion were thought to be mentally insane and were locked up for it. But what the Marxofeminists don't seem to recognize is that they too have "blinding irrational faith." They somehow believe that destruction of society will result in a better society. That all situations where it has been attempted has proven to be a massive human disaster does not deter them at all. So confident are they in the face of logic, history and human decency, that they don't recognize the massive amount of "religious faith" they are displaying with their belief that they are creating a better kind of humanity. All common-sense would resoundingly indicate otherwise.

Now you can believe what I'm saying about the wage gap, or you can surf on over to "A Cuckou Nest" and read what the head cuckou believes causes the wage gap and how to solve it:

http://abirdsnest.wordpress.com/2007/02/17/responses-to-the-commenters-on-the-guilty-pleasures-post/

Uccelline said:

I think it’s important to consider the factors behind the choices we make. If women take five years out of their careers to have children, or work ten hours less per week, these things hardly happen in a vacuum. I suspect such statistics reflect necessity more than choice; if more men took responsibility for childcare, I think you would see a distinct shift.

"Women lawyers don’t marry waiters, but male lawyers do marry waitresses” - those are the stereotypes, sure. But to me this says more about how our culture measures the value of a man as opposed to the value of a woman than about individual dynamics. Women don’t have to be educated or high-earning, they just have to be pretty and pleasant. Men don’t have to be pretty or pleasant, but they should be smart and rich. These expectations hurt everyone, male and female.

Of course, I believe Uccelline is a useful idiot who hasn't got a freakin' clue about anything in life except for knitting and mindlessly bashing men. Anyone who can argue "equality" and then in the same argument declare women are not "equally responsible" is truly a useful idiot in the first degree. This is why she automatically shifts the wage-gap "problem" to men, and then states that hypergamy "expectations hurt everyone, male and female" but of course, she would be hard pressed to define why these expectations hurt everyone... I mean, are children hurt by this too? And more specifically, HOW are children hurt by this? We do know that children fare better with fulltime parental guidance, don't we? And not being poor because of your father's economic performance certainly doesn't hurt children...

But people like Hillary Clinton and other leftist politicians... do you really think they are useful idiots? If I can find out this kind of information on my own, free of charge... what do you think someone with a multi-million dollar political campaign budget and an army of researchers & staff must know in regard to such arguments? And if they don't know, who should?

Makes you wonder, if the general public only knew... would the 0.76 argument suddenly turn to a discussion of whether the gallows will still work if they are only 76% the height of regular gallows?

Monday, February 19, 2007

George Orwell Speaks Out and Tells MGTOW Bloggers How to be the Most Effective

It is worthwhile to read George Orwell's concept of simplifying the written word to maximize the impact on one's readership.

http://www.orwell.ru/library/essays/politics/english/e_polit

Save the English Language!

All but the most pusillanimous of turds will see the value in this.