In fact, I think that we should strive to put an end to all forms of domestic abuse, and I don’t think we should rest until domestic abuse is completely eradicated from our society.
I also think that domestic abuse should be removed from society not only in the terms of male on female violence, but also in regard to female on male violence.
I’ll bet you think that I’m going to start quoting statistics illustrating that females are just as violent as males, don’t you?
Come on, admit it!
Well, sorry to disappoint you, but I don’t think that’s the best way to end domestic abuse.
I believe the best way to “end” domestic abuse is to simply abolish the term “domestic abuse” from our language, from our mindset, and definitely from our courts.
I’m serious. Out of all the feminists who cry out to “end domestic violence,” to all the holier than thou academics who study domestic abuse in an effort to “solve it,” to the plethora of politicians who pledge to pass more laws to “prevent it,” and yes, even to the multitudes of Men's Rights Activists (MRA’s) who demand to be “included as victims of it,” have you ever heard of such a sound plan as mine?
I am the only one with a sure fired, guaranteed formula to actually end all forms of domestic violence!
Why, oh why, am I paid so little?
Why do we have the term “domestic abuse” in the first place?
Weren’t there already laws in place that protected us from violence before the feminists thought up the term “domestic violence?”
Living together in the same house does not somehow free one from impartial judgment by the law of the land. At least, I can’t find the law which says that it does, or ever did.
Were there laws on the books that granted “spousal immunity” in regard to general assault and battery laws?
Could you legally murder your spouse before the term “domestic abuse” was concocted, or did homicide laws protect people regardless of their marital status?
If someone were to, say, threaten to “pound something into my thick skull,” can I not go to the proper authorities, report it, and ask for a restraining order regardless of whether the person is in my immediate family or not?
Wasn’t all of this covered already before the term “domestic abuse” became a household word at the behest of the feminists’ socially redefining academic and legal juggernauts?
We can end “domestic abuse” completely by simply getting rid of the term itself and going back to allowing the law to protect us in the way it used to.
I’ll send the government my bill.
And by golly, YES, I will accept that tenured position at the University of British Columbia!
Does anything better illustrate how sick we have become as a society than the phenomenon that we can no longer comprehend how to function without begging the government to impose more laws upon us?
Not only do we ask for less freedom, but we demand that problems be completely solved by passing more and more laws until every last aspect of the problem is gone.
Imagine a lobby group was formed to “end speeding” and they pledge to keep fighting until every last speeder is removed from the roads.
It starts off small, perhaps with a policy of “zero tolerance” for being even one mph over the limit and increasing the fines by 50% to hurt people in their jeans.
But, some people are still speeding.
What to do, what to do?
Well, let’s give speeders points on their driver’s license which will increase their insurance premiums!
“Zooooooommmmm!!!” The sound reverberates in a rubber-necker’s ears.
“There out to be a law!” he exclaims, “Doooooo something!”
So, we pass a law that anyone caught speeding will have their car impounded for 6 months.
But still, someone will speed, somewhere.
I think you can see where this is going. In the end, there is absolutely no possible way to remove every last speeder from the road… except, that is, to make it illegal for anyone to drive a car, period. That is the only possible end to the equation.
And so it is. Transportation by automobile benefits mankind to an enormous degree, but there are certain negatives we must accept that go along with the positives. If we want easy, fast mobility and cheap transportation of goods, we must also accept there will be a certain amount negatives that are unavoidable.
There will be speeders, there will be accidents, and there will be injuries and deaths.
And we must accept that there will be these negatives or we will not receive the positives.
This concept is all around us in nature. Mankind must not be as smart as he thought if he can’t see what is all around him.
People who say they will not rest until the problem is completely solved are preaching totalitarianism and should be made to spend an afternoon in the stocks; letting some tomatoes smarten them up a few IQ points.
The world will never be perfect.
Only Marxists preach that they can create Heaven on Earth. And they preach it will be achieved by slavery to a totalitarian state.
Marxists are evil idiots. Many feminists and academics are unabashed Marxists.
Have a look at how the Abuse Industry works with our children.
Instead of asking a hard working farmer and his wife of 40 years how they successfully raised eight law-abiding, successful children, we ask someone completely different for “expert” advice.
Who do we ask?
We ask an angry 45 year old lesbian with a Ph D in Whatchamacallit, who herself comes from a broken home. She has one 3 year old child which was spawned by Thomas the Turkey Baster.
These kinds of people are our “experts.”
And, what do our “experts” recommend?
Parents should not be allowed to decide how to discipline their own children! Some parents have “over-disciplined” their children, and therefore no parent should be allowed to discipline their child with spanking.
That parents have successfully raised their children with the aid of physical discipline for thousands of years now becomes irrelevant to our academic gods. Times are different now. Yes, fine individuals like George Washington and Abraham Lincoln were spanked as children, but children were born with leather asses back in those days. Children born today are different from them. Can’t you tell? They now have three arms and green skin!
“Parents have been wrong for thousands of years," cries our Sapphic guru, “and some parents have abused spanking to the point where it is physically abusive, therefore NO parents should be allowed to do it!”
It is much better to let a child learn that playing in traffic is dangerous by sitting the five year old down and explaining it to him. If discipline is needed, a “time out” is recommended, and ultimately, children need to figure out and learn these things on their own anyway. That Mack truck has a natural lesson it will teach your child, so what the hell do you parents think you are doing, giving your child a smack on his bottom? You Cretins!
You see, our “intellectuals” have manipulated our legal systems with a belief that it is better to have all children raised at 50% capacity, rather than to have 95% of children raised at 100% capacity, with the remaining 5% raised at 25%.
They believe they can prevent this:
By making everyone live in a Utopia that looks like this:
Our lesbian lecturer will tell us that this is for “the greater good,” but it becomes obvious that she is not an expert in mathematics.
You see, 100% of the population at 50% equals 50%.
But (95% of the population at 100%) plus (5% of the population at 25%) equals 96.25%.
A population operating at 96.25% capacity is greater than one operating at 50%.
Who’s telling who about “the greater good?”
Everywhere you look in nature you will find this formula.
It’s time for us to recognize that laws can also be repealed!
We already had legal mechanisms protecting us from violence. We didn’t need to have a whole further myriad of never ending laws bringing the whole herd down to 50% capacity.
And we certainly don’t need to lobby to be included within them, feeding the Utopian beast even more.
End the Abuse Industry NOW!
It’s the only sure fired way to rid the world of Domestic Abuse.
"Heaven on Earth" is a nice fairytale theory. But in practice it becomes a Living Hell.
Previous Index Next