Friday, March 05, 2004

Bonecrker #64 - On Players


Briefly talking with a woman (or better yet, figuring it out before ever approaching them) to discover if she is attracted to you is hardly being a player. Neither is causally breaking off contact with the 90% of women who don’t fall into that category. Women are not entitled to anything from you, least of all your interest in them if they have none in you. A player is trying to get away with something. He is without confidence and lacks an understanding that he has the right to determine the nature and direction of any relationships he is in, and with whom. So, he lies, cheats and goes to incredible lengths to try and fool women. I think the basic problem here is he is trying to convince the 90% (impossible). Don’t do that. Instead, be assertive and honest. Build confidence by gaining experience. Understand that if you do what you are supposed to be doing and someone (especially a woman) accuses you of doing something wrong, it is a manipulation, with no basis in fact. She is trying to get away with something and claims that it is universal to all women. THAT IS A LIE!

If a woman sees you as a player when you are, instead, being rational and assertive, it means something is wrong with HER. She is trying to scam you. No one else will think you are a player, least of all the women who are interested in you.

For example, let’s say you are interested in a short duration, non-monogamous fling. Be upfront and honest about it. When you are starting to become intimate with a woman, she will sometimes ask you where this is going. Tell her you are only looking for a fling and give her the option to say, "No, that’s not what I want from you" (very few women will do that, BTW). Her shrewish friends might call you a player, simply because you aren’t willing to get on all fours and beg for sex and swear your undying love, all your present and future earnings and put up with limitless abuse, just to get some pussy. But as long as you don’t lie, she definitely won’t think that way (for the limited time her feelings for you last, that is). And neither will anyone else who matters.

Being honest and direct like this INCREASES your chances with women, not decreases. A small minority of incredibly insane women (as in, everything else about them is insane too), have a problem with that. But all your behavior should revolve around making sure they aren’t even allowed to talk to you, let alone influence your life.

Also, although I don’t allow relationships to get too deep anymore, I am hardly engaging in a “fuck and dump” strategy. I simply understand that her interest in me has an expiration date (once it expires, her interest in me turns dark and sinister), so I better not get any ideas about the long term. Since there is no long term, I have no reason to exclude myself to any one girl. Unfortunately, they don’t understand that (if they did, maybe they would fix it, lol) and constantly try to deepen the relationship, forcing me to set limits. The most effective way to set limits isn’t through what I say, but rather through what I do. And, what I do is limit the time I spend with a woman and refuse certain activities (like meeting her family). That’s OK with most women (as long as you don’t lie or use or abuse them) for varying amounts of time. Then they wander off. You need to be OK with that. And you won’t be OK with that unless you have another to take her place. And you won’t have another to take her place if you stop looking for interested women every time you meet one.

Previous Bonecrcker Index Next

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related:

Bonecrcker #45 - Niceguys

Bonecrcker #114 – To All The Girls I’ve Loved Before

Thursday, March 04, 2004

Bonecrker #63 - Most People Who Work in Community Mental Health are Insane


Most of the people who work in community mental health are completely insane…..that includes almost all of the people working on the master’s level, especially in counselling and social work. It was because of these people that I abandoned my career in Clinical Psychology and went for the doctorate in Chiropractic instead.

Some examples of the behavior I saw among staff working inpatient community mental health:
First off, the main offices were located in the worst, most dangerous urban environment I’ve ever seen (and I’ve been to a lot of shitholes in my time). I kept my Glock on me at all times there.

One male staffer got caught on three separate occasions, getting blowjobs from male patients. All three were HIV positive.

Another male staffer, had sex with a number of female drug addicts who were slated for release into rehab (they were prostitutes).

A female staffer had a former patient living with her as her lover. He was an ex-con (for murder), heavy drug user (also HIV positive), incredibly violent, and had been inpatient for a psychotic break, with a long history of violence during his psychotic episodes.

I caught this same staffer dispensing meds to patients that they had no prescription for (a felony). When I told her to stop, she screamed for over an hour about how I dare tell her how to do her job. Supervisor did nothing.

Another staffer traded bourbon with patients for crack cocaine. Although I brought this to the attention of the highest levels of management (all women), they did nothing and eventually promoted this woman to run the entire inpatient system (a very high level, highly paid government job). Although all government jobs require mandatory drug testing in the city, ours was mysteriously overlooked in the testing system.

My immediate superior had been caught several times, having sex with employees under her, on the physical plant grounds.

Two female staffers told me this bizarre story one day (one was the drug user….go figure) about how they saw a flying saucer that whizzed all around the facility grounds (nightshift) until stopping barely a few feet from them and whizzing away…..I shit you not.

Once, I had to escort one of the female staffers home because her ex-husband was threatening to kill her.

Lastly, the entire system was, in my opinion, a scam. Very few of our patients were of the legitimate, mental illness variety (even though we were the centralized mental health facility for a major metropolitan area). Some of the patients had mental illness like symptoms that were completely the result of crack cocaine use (ie, after a couple of weeks of rehab, they became symptom free, even in serious cases). But most of the patients were simple crack addicts who were homeless. At the cost of thousands and thousands of dollars, we warehoused these yahoos for a bit before moving them in and out of rehab and trying fruitlessly to place them in outpatients systems (drug use makes you ineligible you see……means you are out on the street). They were in no way interested in anything except doing crack and just running the system to get a roof over their head (you aren’t allowed in the shelters if you are using drugs…they test). A typical example would be one of these yahoos being picked up by the cops. An ambulance (at least $2 thousand dollars each trip) would transport them to our facility where they would stay inpatient (about a grand a day) until they were “stable” enough to be placed outpatient or they decompensated and had to be hospitalized ($2-3 grand a day). All for someone who isn’t mentally ill. As far as I could see, these wastes of life completely pushed out all the legitimate patients. Which tells me that the people designing the system are the most insane of all.

The system is insane and any person who tells you they work in that system is probably insane too. If not, they soon will be.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Related:
.

Wednesday, March 03, 2004

Bonecrker #62 - You Must Be A Loser


(Re.: A Female Response to an Online Dating Profile)

Note the assumption that since she doesn’t find your profile attractive, you must be a loser. "Loser" being a highly emotionally charged yet undefined term. In other words, you couldn’t ask, "Well, what could I do to not be a loser?" and get a legitimate answer. On a related topic, you couldn’t ask her what would make you a winner. You couldn’t change what you do in any way that would make her want you.

The sole purpose of her response is to blame you for a problem she has. You will actually see this pattern repeated over and over again. She does something wrong (which in this case she did…..she started to immediately criticize you over the slightest slip of the tongue). The normal response is to go, "Ummm, sorry. You’re an asshole. Bye." But, when you try to explain why, she acts like you are being incredibly insulting. Actually, her attitude is, "How dare you protest even the slightest bit about her heaping abuse on you!" To say that the correct response is to immediately break off contact with no explanation at all is putting it mildly. This person is sitting around wondering why all her interactions with men end with them either rejecting her or using her and then dumping her. This pattern is why.

And it's why she doesn’t deserve any better.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:
.
.
.

Tuesday, March 02, 2004

Bonecrker #61 - There is No Pattern to a Woman's Attraction


There absolutely is no pattern whatsoever to a woman’s attraction. Or rather, just like men, they are attracted to large numbers of the opposite sex, with a rather low standard of beauty. But, unlike men, they suppress that attraction (women are sick). They don’t do that in other cultures which is why their behavior differs, I think. There is no pattern, AT ALL, to when a woman switches off her suppression of attraction. But, when she does, she rationalizes it after the fact. Often, she switches it off because she has starved herself for affection for so long that she "binges"…..goes out, gets drunk, and picks up some random guy. Not only that, but women are total cowards. Even if they are drooling over some guy, they won’t even hint at it unless the guy elicits it somehow.

There are four exceptions to this. The first is if a guy is extremely provocative, with model good looks. Often, his presence will elicit a binge in a woman. Often it won’t and he will be treated like a dog, even though he is literally, on the top of the food chain. The second is the rich guy. Women will allow themselves (or, mostly pretend to allow) themselves to become attracted to a rich guy, to get their hands on his money. The third is someone who is famous. Even a moderate amount of fame will have large numbers of women drooling over a guy. The last, is the worst of all…..evil. Larges numbers of women go through periods where they are VERY attracted to evil. Some women are like this all the time. Literally, nothing else matters about the guy…looks, station, and basic hygiene. You could (and many are) 200 pounds overweight, smell BAD, have missing teeth and beat women every chance you get, and you will be drowning in pussy from this phenomena, as long as you are an ex-con, with a drug problem. This phenomenon is probably the single biggest threat to our way of life and the general happiness and well being of everyone. It is also an extremely good reason for strict, “three strikes your out” laws. Not only don’t we want these scum on the street, but, left to their own devices, they can and do destroy large segments of our population….getting girls hooked on drugs, they are prime spreaders of AIDS and other STD’s in our social circles, destroying families, illegitimate births, etc. Permanent imprisonment is a rational, reasonable and just solution to this problem.

Anyway, my point is this. It is impossible to increase the number of women who are interested in you by increasing your “attractiveness”. You can lose weight, buff up your body, get better clothes, better style, whatever, and you may change slightly the quality of women who are interested in you, but not the number. You can also change your behavior, but that only changes who specifically reacts to you. You can be nice, or you can be playfully arrogant, or you can be a total shitheel. You can sharpen your technique or get better at the “game”. But, it’s all pointless. It may change who, but not how many. Nothing will allow you to pick and choose who, specifically, will respond.

The problem isn’t attraction. The problem isn’t with us. The PROBLEM is the neurotic behavior of women. You can’t change them. But, once you understand the situation, you can change the way you approach the problem to become more effective.
.
Previous Bonecrcker Index Next
.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related:

Bonecrcker #41 – Finding the Small Pool of Interested Women

Bonecrcker #122 – The Advantage The Big City Has Over The Small Town

Monday, March 01, 2004

Bonecrker #60 - A Man Must Strive to Prevent Women from Having the Smallest Shred of Power Over Him

.
The fact that [anti-male] sentiments exist and are widespread is one of the biggest reasons why a man, every man, must strive to prevent women from having even the smallest shred of power over him. He must build his life and his decisions like a fortress…..create his life with this goal in mind, that if he EVER sees even the slightest hint of attitudes like this, from any specific woman, no matter in what sphere of his life, he immediately and permanently removes that woman from his life. And he strives to prevent any of his resources from being usurped to support that woman. And his decisions are always made in such a way as to reserve that right.

In practical terms that means no marriage and no living together. It means saying no to almost everything a woman asks of you. It means making sure she can’t get pregnant from you. It means not hiring women (and hiding that fact). It means not relying on women doctors, lawyers, accountants etc. It means voting against any candidate who tries to force you, through various means to support these women (ie no welfare, no child support laws, no funky divorce laws, and taxes and government spending, especially socialist spending kept to a minimum).

Women give great lip service to the tired old saying…..a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle. But, what a lie that is. Without us, they starve. Let them starve.

BTW, heterosexual women aren’t the only group that hold attitudes like this, are not even the ones that hold these attitudes and agenda the strongest. This is the reality behind the facade of most, if not all, groups associated with the far left (and many on the far right). Groups like the ACLU and NOW and the pro-life movement. If you wonder why I am so hell bent against gay marriage, it’s because that issue isn’t about equality for gays, it’s about the availability of gay marriage serving THIS agenda: The destruction of marriage and the family. These people rationalize it (the insanity of this is extreme and obvious), by judging this way of life as somehow oppressive and unworthy….in need of tearing down to be replaced by something else. But, the truth is, these people are crazy and they hate everything and everyone. They know damn well, this is the normal way of doing things and, if you destroy it, nothing will replace it. People will suffer and die. That’s their goal. I refuse to cooperate. I am not fooled by their emotional and manipulative portrayal of this situation as one of equal rights, similar to the one we went through for race. It has nothing to do with that. And never did.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
Further Reading:
.
.
.

Saturday, February 28, 2004

Bonecrker #59 - Four Kinds of Women Which Are More Psycho than the Others


There are four classifications of women that are far more psycho than [the rest]. They are:

1. Woman with a criminal record (number one in the psycho classification)

2. Any woman who uses drugs of any type. Warning, this includes pot.

3. Any woman who works in any capacity in the sex for money industry……prostitute, phone sex, porno, stripper, nude pictures, hooters girl, shot girl, any job selling alcohol where looks are a factor (ie almost any job serving alcohol, except as a bartender/waitress in the most classy establishments).

4. Any woman that has been in a lesbian relationship. By that, I don’t necessarily include bi/curious girls (lol, all women are bi/curious, despite what they may say). No, I mean any woman that has had a woman as sole-sexual partner on a regular basis.

There are also a dozen types of psychos that aren’t as bad as the women you mention, but, since I consider ALL of these women to be in the, do not touch under any circumstances, OR ELSE, classification, you could argue that they are all equally bad.

For example:

Women that have ever dated a deviant male or female…..drug dealer, criminal etc

Married women

Women with accidental pregnancies

Has ever accused a man of rape or sexual harassment

Violent temper

Trains in weapons for no good reason

Has relatives that are deviant….see above

Eating disorder or (God forbid), serious mental illness like schizophrenia, bipolar, borderline or other personality disorder, PTSD (rape) and basically, anything else more serious than depression or an anxiety disorder

More than $100,000 in debt. With specific exceptions for good debt. Good debt is any debt spent on an investment that returns more money than it costs to repay the payments on the debt…..businesses, rental property, paper assets (rare) etc. The wealthiest people in the world are millions of dollars in debt…..good debt.

More than $10,000 in debt from anything else besides owning a home, student loans, or investing in a business, real estate etc.

Ever expresses hate speech or other hateful behavior about men, or any other type…..for example racist remarks.

Has had more than one abortion or has had even one abortion and doesn’t express deep remorse for it, or treats the issue of abortion as a woman’s right issue rather than a rather unfortunate circumstance to prevents people lives from being ruined.

Is a witch or (God forbid) a Satanist.

The list goes on and on. Basically, there are two types of women in this world, acceptable and unacceptable. The unacceptable ones are easy to identify. Their behavior is bizarre, deviant, and extreme.

Previous Bonecrcker Index Next

Friday, February 27, 2004

Bonecrker #58 - Women Are Narcissistic and Self-Absorbed


What’s going on is women are totally narcissistic and self-absorbed. They also see the world in very distorted ways and are all the time mistaking where things are coming from.

For example, women do not ever want to hear anything about you (sad but true). Women always find this offensive and think the guy is narcissistic (a projection of what they actually are) even if his talking about himself is brief and in context to the situation. On the other hand, if you spend all your time asking leading questions about her and then fleshing out the details of her life, only pausing to add various compliments to her, she will think you are the most brilliant conversationalist in the world, even though you have basically said nothing. You can do this for hours and hours and she’ll never even think to ask anything about you. It’s downright bizarre and disturbing, once you’ve experienced it. But not as bizarre and disturbing as the effect it has on how they see you.

However, NEVER get in the habit of being a sounding board for women’s problems. This has various, extremely negative, effects on how she sees you. Not only does she become a whiney drain on your very life-force, she permanently puts you in the “no sex” category. Every time you see her, she’ll start telling you all her problems (even making up problems for purposes of drama). This also is so sick and bizarre that most men don’t really believe it until they experience it for themselves.

Talking about her is a tool. A tool to build rapport with her during your first few conversations. It needs to be replaced with something else, soon after that. It’s an example of mapping out the sickness that women have and using that information to work around it. However, like all tools, it is only good for certain specific situations. It will serve in many other related situations (you can always bang a nail with a wrench, but a hammer would be better) and is completely inappropriate for many more.

Previous Bonecrcker Index Next

-------------------------------------------------------------------

"It was a fool who said that women are attached to their appearance. Anyone can see it is not their appearance they are attached to, but what their appearance brings them . . . attention, compliments, self-respect, friends, employment, sex, men, children . . . and the list goes on!

I once heard a woman say "I take a lot of care of my appearance, but I don't like to think of myself as shallow"!" -- Kevin Solway

------------------------------------------------------------------

“‘Really, women’s desire is not relational, it’s narcissictic.’ — it’s dominated by the yearnings of ‘self-love,’ by the wish to be the object of erotic admiration and sexual need. Still, on the subject of narcissism, she talked about research indicating that, in comparison with men, women’s erotic fantasies center less on giving pleasure and more on getting it. ‘When it comes to desire,’ she added, ‘women may be far less relational than men.’” -- Sex and Relationships, Bonobo Sex, and ‘Lady Boners’: Is Women’s Desire Really That Confusing? – by Vanessa Richmond

------------------------------------------------------------------

"The second fastest way to lose a woman is to treat her as a sex object. The first fastest is not to." -- Fred Reed

------------------------------------------------------------------

"Women have no sympathy... And my experience of women is almost as large as Europe. And it is so intimate too. Women crave for being loved, not for loving. They scream at you for sympathy all day long, they are incapable of giving you any in return for they cannot remember your affairs long enough to do so." -- Florence Nightingale

Thursday, February 26, 2004

Bonecrker #57 - Approaching Fat/Ugly Chicks is Harmful to Your Self-Esteem


Approaching fat/ugly chicks can be seriously harmful to your self-esteem. They are no more likely to find you attractive than a Pamela Anderson look-alike, and you will feel like total shit when they give you that, “get away from me you loser” look. But, it gets worse….MUCH worse. Fat/ugly chicks assume that if you are paying them any attention at all, you must be such a fucking loser that you can’t get anyone else…..and they treat you like it. Of course, this does zero to affect their sense of entitlement. In other words, you are a loser for wanting someone so heinous but they are still a princess, even though they ARE heinous. Plus, women who are fat/ugly are usually INSANE. They are into suffering big time and want to take you along for the ride. Unlike men who are usually fat because they eat too much, women are usually fat as a side effect of serious personality disorders that manifest as bulimia (binge eating, with or without vomiting), drug use and other fun stuff. Stay the hell away from women like this.

Women often bitterly complain that they are discriminated against if they are fat. But, it’s not true. A man who is fat has no chance with women (unless he is in the criminal scum class….but that’s another story). But, most fat/ugly chicks have a man. The people who discriminate against them are other women, not men. However, many men learn the hard way that they aren’t just fat, they are demented assholes. They give them a chance, often giving several fat women a chance, only to be treated like total dirt in the most fucked up situations. So, they learn to avoid them (at least I have, lol). It’s this issue that makes men avoid fat chicks, not their weight.

Previous Bonecrcker Index Next

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Bonecrker #39 – Fat Bottom Girls

Bonecrcker #157 – Eating Disorders

Bonecrcker #161 – The Old “Fat But Working On It” Line

Bonecrcker #171 – The Problem Isn’t the Body, It’s the Mind

Zenpriest #19 – How Women Keep Score

Wednesday, February 25, 2004

Bonecrker #56 - Giving Stuff to Women Leads to Unreasonable Behaviour

...the attitude of giving stuff to women is what opens the door to unreasonable behavior and expectations in the first place. It’s a form of brain washing. First, it’s expected that you give the woman a gift (or they’ll leave). Next, it has to be a good (defined by them based on the whim de jour) gift. Lastly, the standard for a “good” gift is made unreasonable. Not only is the standard of “good” gift set by her but she won’t tell you what it is and will judge you negatively if you get it wrong, or even ask her about it.

This is best handled by saying, well, what makes you think you are entitled to a gift AT ALL? I will decide if, and under what circumstances you get a gift and that gift’s nature. And, I could care less if you judge me negatively for it (very important). If you choose to leave over that, I WILL LET YOU GO (even more important).

Wrong attitude on men’s part opens the door wide to unreasonable behavior, judgement and expectations on women’s part.

If it was me, and the woman hinted that my gift sucked, I wouldn’t be trying to get better gifts by asking her what a good gift is. I’d be considering dumping her. Why? Because, there is no fixable problem here. The relationship is taking an inexorable path down the shitter BY HER CHOICE. Not mine. She has become presumptuous and greedy, not that I have become a lame gift giver.

You see, the big lie here is that the problem is what the man is doing or even the problem is something the man and the woman are doing together. If that was true, you simply fix the problem and live happily ever after. It just doesn’t work that way. No matter what you do, with her or by yourself, things will get worse and worse. The real problem is with her. She CHOOSES to be this way, so you have no power over her free will, other than to leave. Or better yet, say no to her, and do whatever the hell you were going to do anyway, until she chooses to leave.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Bonecrker #21 - Who Pays?

Bonecreker #27 - Gifts

Bonecrker #55 - Dates

Tuesday, February 24, 2004

Bonecrker #55 - Dates

Dates, where you expend time, money, effort, whatever, are only for someone you’ve been with awhile and are already fucking (as in plural). You call both these situations “dates” but they aren’t even close to being the same thing. The first case, you are setting up a situation for one or more of three things. You are being evaluated. Right away, this sends the exact wrong message, that you need to be good enough, somehow to be with a particular woman (to say that is a lie, is a dramatic understatement on many different levels). Second, it opens the door wide for exploitation. Who seeks out situations where they get to exploit people? Women like this. In other words, if she is seeking to get set up on dates, she is probably looking for someone to exploit and that means she has a whole bunch of other negative traits (like the ones yous saw, hehe). The last thing she is looking for is the hook up. Totally neurotic, restrictive, arrogant and contemptuous, 95% of the time, she “binges” the other 5% of the time. She looks to have sex with anybody (don’t be surprised if you find out she went out after your date, picked up some drunk at a bar and had sex in his car, without even finding out his name) with no intimacy and often under fucked up circumstances. That’s how she ended up with her charming tattoo and probably other fun stuff (like herpes). If you went out with her a dozen times, she would care about you no more than navel lint.

The second type of “date” is totally different. Doing it only with someone you are intimate with, it has the goal of doing something fun, to become even more intimate. Afterward, you are probably going home to have sex and be together.

Just say no to the first type of “date”. Someone want to hook you up on a blind date? Say no. Tell them to have that person come along a few times when you are hanging out with that mutual friend, preferably for a relaxing evening at home.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

Monday, February 23, 2004

Bonecrker #54 - Women Should Cultivate Anything That Typically is a Virtue...

Women should cultivate anything that is typically a virtue……honesty, commitment, kindness, nurturing behavior, focus, reliability. Although the list goes on and on, ALL of the things on that list go together. Nobody (and I mean NOBODY) cares that you have a high paying job or lots of “interests” or if you are smart, sophisticated, high maintenance, whatever. What they care about is if you are a good person. If they add you to their life (and that is what you are asking them to do), will you enhance their life or be a detriment. Sadly, almost all women are a detriment, and not in a minor way. Most men, who get married, can expect their life to turn to shit, because of direct behaviours from their women. No man wants that, and any man who even thinks he might someday want to be married, and have a family, is desperately looking for the woman who isn’t like that. If you are that RARE woman (I have certainly never met one), you will have your choice of men, and be given preference above all others (except by the losers of our society…..drug users, criminals, frat boys, most lawyers etc……losers). Who should you choose? The same type of man who cultivates virtues. Although VERY few women are like this, large numbers of men are like this. They are all around you.

I’d like to point out that every woman SAYS they are like this, but when you look at their behavior, it just doesn’t match up. Nobody cares what you say about how you are. They are judging you on your behavior. Only after a man sees by your behavior, that you are just another woman of low worth, does he start reducing you to only what your body is. If he had no sex drive, he would probably ignore you entirely. If you don’t like that, then you must have something more to offer. That something must be of yourself…..not your role, not your status, not your occupation, and certainly not your tits, but….who….you…are…..must be noble and worthy. This is an objective criterion, not a subjective one. It can be learned and implemented and the rewards for doing so are very great.

Previous Bonecrcker Index Next

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bonecrcker #46 – Feminism Turns Women Into Mere Sex Objects (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #151 – The Woman Who Is The Exception Phenomena (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #154 – Women Are Bitches To Nice Girls (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #167 – Advice For Women On Inviting Guys To Approach You (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #174 – The Measure Of A Person’s Worth Is Their Actions (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #176 – Women Making More Money Than Their Husbands (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #177 – Responsibility And Power Go Hand In Hand (advice to women)

Sunday, February 22, 2004

Bonecrker #53 - Online Dating is a Scam

How much more evidence do you need to gather before you realize that the women on dating services are doing something other than looking for a man. What sort of behavior would you expect from women who were using the service to actually find a man? They would have pictures taken specifically to show them in the best possible light (cheap and easy to do in most places). They would write a well thought out, articulate profile, mind their P’s and Q’s, and try to both present themselves and what they want in such a way that they find someone who is a good match. They would, ummmm, actually look at men’s profiles and email men they were interested in. And they would spend a significant amount of time chatting via IM, leaving it open only during times they have specifically put aside for this purpose. They would be polite, and interested in getting to know people to see if they were a good match and if it would be fruitful to meet with them in person.

Now, do women on the dating service do ANY of those things? Absolutely not. They do the opposite…..crappy pic of them and their ex with his head rubbed/cut out (sometimes, obviously drunk), profile looks like it was written by a 3rd grader who barely speaks English, with red flags all over the place, tons of rude, bitter, negative statements, sometimes openly stating they hate men or intend to exploit you, reveal little to nothing about what they are like as a person (sometimes because there is nothing there or something is there that nobody wants), rarely looks at men’s profiles and NEVER responds to them no matter how good looking, alpha-male, rich, great personality, sexy, whatever, the man is, actively rude or time wasting on IM, pretends to bond with you and then, later, pretends has no idea who you are or what you agreed to do together earlier.

What this means, quite simply, is they aren’t looking for a man (so, it’s a waste of time to use this method to find a woman). At best, they are looking to have their egos stroked by saying no to all the men who seem to be interested in them (actually, these men have no interest in them and are just trolling the entire female database, for the one chick about to binge) and then will have an anonymous sexual encounter with some random loser, when they have been too long without love, sex or intimacy (ie they binge). At worst, these psychos are looking to actively harm someone, any way they can, as long as it is safe for them.

What’s going on with the online dating thing is women are wasting time and men are emailing hundreds of women, trolling for anonymous encounters with sluts.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Bonecrker #34 – Online Dating – Not!

Bonecrcker #89 - Identifying Women Who Are Wasting Your Time

Bonecrcker #90 – There Is No Point In Approaching Any Woman Who Doesn’t Look At You And Go “Yum”

Bonecrcker #124 – Women on Online Personals Are Just Wasting Your Time

Saturday, February 21, 2004

Bonecrker #52 - Man Hating Dykes

There is a HEAVY undertone of lesbianism involved in the anti-men hate groups. Wherever you see the real fanatics that stray from the supposed issue at hand to spit vitriol at men, you find the lesbians behind it, or at least in the middle of it. When I say that gay people have an agenda and are trying to undermine our society, this is part of what I mean. These are some of the specific behaviours they are doing. They try to hide their man-hating, family-hating, society-hating agenda, but like all psychotics, they can’t quite keep a lid on it.

Don’t misunderstand me. There is nothing wrong with munching a little rug. Almost all girls have this as a normal part of their [hetero] sexuality. But lesbianism isn’t about having sex with women…..it’s about hating men, and it’s about hating a system that values morality and rewards virtue and merit. In my opinion, that is a pretty strong case for treating self-described “lesbians” as pariahs. Certainly, no one should cooperate with them on anything, and should always be deeply suspicious whenever they bring up an issue that supposedly addresses a wrong-doing (for example…..gay marriage). Abortions, rape, equal rights, have all been fertile grounds for this manipulative crap. You can always tell because they are highly resistant to any desire to critically examine the situation to find out if there is a problem and, if so, what is the exact nature of that problem. Mysteriously, they are never around when the work of fixing a real problem that has been identified. But, they never lack for time, energy or resources to spit hate at men, family, or just our way of life in general.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Bonecrker #42 - Lesbians and Gay Men

Bonecrker #60 – A Man Must Strive to Prevent Women from Having the Smallest Shred of Power Over Him

Bonecrcker #135 – With Gay Marriage Legal, Gays Might Stop Getting Into Marriages That Are a Lie

Bonecrcker #136 – Not All That Opposed To Gay Marriage

A New Kind of Bigotry

Friday, February 20, 2004

Bonecrker #51 - Don't Argue With Women


It is a mistake to argue with women. Arguments are all about words and women in our culture don’t match up words with actions and freely say things that don’t make sense and then deny that they don’t make sense. In short, they aren’t honest when trying to solve problems using discussion, negotiation and compromise. The reason they aren’t honest is because they are trying to be abusive and exploitative rather than having relationships based on mutual love and respect.

Instead, deal with women in the realm of behavior. Point to a behavior you don’t like and tell her to stop, or point out a missing behavior of hers and tell her to do it. Never discuss why you don’t like it or why you want her to do something. Get used to saying the word NO….a lot. And NEVER discuss things in terms of right and wrong (it’s enough that YOU want it). Always have a consequence lined up if she refuses, and ALWAYS come through with that consequence. Flakey girls get dumped, if you get my drift. This only works if you have her replacement waiting in the wings to take her place (your needs, not people’s expectations, are what’s important). Understand that, in our culture, ALL girls are flakey and need to be dumped sooner or later, so don’t hesitate to do so, or let them get away with anything. As this behavior among men becomes common (and it is), women’s flakiness will drop off dramatically.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Bonecrcker #93 – She’s Lying

Bonecrcker #95 - No, no, no, no, No, NO!

Bonecrcker #97 – The #1 Mistake Most Men Make With Women Is… Talking To Them

Bonecrcker #110 – The Problem With Discussing Things With Women

Bonecrcker #113 – Everything Out of a Woman’s Mouth is a Lie

Social Strategy: Why Men Shouldn't Argue with Women

Philalethes #3 – The Anti-Logic of Women

Philalethes #8 – When the Cow Rides the Bull, Priest Watch Your Skull

Philalethes #29 – They Can Do It Because They Really Believe It!

Zenpriest #27 – Ignoring Women

The Intimate Journal of Henri Amiel – Dec, 26, 1868

Thursday, February 19, 2004

Bonecrker #50 - Escalating with Women

While it’s good to have a take it or leave it attitude, it’s also important to have the attitude of continuously testing the waters and trying to advance things. If you don’t, when she expects you to, she will lose interest/get pissed and wander off. The pattern goes something like this. If you look at a woman and she looks back, she is inviting you to be attracted and initiate things with her…..so smile. If she is receptive and smiles back, she is inviting you to come talk to her. If you talk to her and she seems to enjoy it, she is inviting you to get to know her, so get her phone number. If you talk to her on the phone and you “click”, she is receptive to being asked out on a date. If you are out on a date and she touches you, she is inviting you to touch her, so do so in an appropriate way. Later, try to hold hands with her. If she holds hands with you, she is inviting more intimate contact, so touch her hair. If she lets you touch her hair, it’s OK to try and kiss her. If she kisses you, then it’s OK to cuddle with her. If she cuddles with you, it’s OK to touch her more intimately. If that goes well, touch her sexually….and escalate from there. The point is to not skip any steps and always be testing out the next level of intimacy. This works best if you take your time, build anticipation and get her expecting/desiring the level of intimacy you already have. You do that by testing a little bit and then pulling back, pushing ahead a little bit more and then pulling back. She is in control about letting you advance but after she makes that decision, you are in control about when, and how much. That’s the behavior that separates a friend from a lover.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

Wednesday, February 18, 2004

Bonecrker #49 - Shit Tests vs. Psychotic Raving Lunatic Tests

All women test, that’s a fact of life. They want to know the steel content of your balls. To pass the test, your response needs to be some version of, I’m going to do whatever I choose to do, whether you like it or not, and for no better reason than I want to…..and if you don’t like it, you can just leave because, quite frankly, there are other women waiting for me to get rid of you so they can have a turn.

But…….there are relatively normal, reasonable tests…..and psychotic, raving lunatic tests. If you ever get a psychotic, raving lunatic test, don’t address it…..just dump her with no further explanation. Simply walk away from her and never speak to her again. Also, if you pass normal tests, all testing should cease for awhile. If, instead, she escalates the testing, the more she escalates, the more you should consider dumping her.

Examples of lunatic tests:

She accuses you of cheating

She steals from you

You go to the bathroom at a bar, restaurant etc. and you come back to find her flirting with another guy, she hits on another guy while you are around or tries to provoke a situation between you and another guy

She makes a scene out in public

Calls the cops on you for any reason whatsoever

Well, you get the picture.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related:

Philalethes #3 – The Anti-Logic of Women

Tuesday, February 17, 2004

Bonecrker #48 - Sexes Approaching Eachother

For all the myths that women are more intuitive, more social, more emotionally intelligent, aware of feelings etc., it is all basically a lie.

The bottom line is this: Men don't actually make the first move... women do.

They signal openness. Or rather, they are supposed to. Then an interested man will signal his interest to approach, usually by looking her in the eyes and smiling. A normal man won't apporach unless invited. If a man approaches without being invited it either means he is a psycho or he is one of the few men that have learned that women just don't get it, and he is compensating by testing the waters more aggressively. Yes, a lot of men don't know the steps to meeting a woman and, as a result, are socially awkward and have trouble meeting women (even when she is highly interested). This lack of skill leads to lack of confidence which then becomes a vicious circle.

Part of the problem is women are just as clueless about doing their part in the meeting ritual.

But, the biggest part of the problem is most women are completely out of control of their own sexuality. What I mean by this is, rather than deciding beforehand what she wants and then figuring out how to go about getting it, she tends to instead shut down. 90% of the time, and she is completely uninterested in any partner. That's a big problem because (most) men hunt and women choose. If 90% of the time that choice is no to anyone, and she is unaware of what she is doing, the chances for success aren't very good. The other 10% of the time, she gets overwhelmed by her needs (hormonal and otherwise) which forces her to be open to men who aren't a good match... leading to the ironic perception that there are no good men (ie no men who are a good match for her) Even though she is surrounded by them. Add in that most women put themselves on sexual display with the way they dress but shut down all signals of interest and the stage is set for some pretty fucked up behaviours.

In short, neurotic behavior in both men and women, lack of knowledge and lack of skill are at the root of the problem. Add in the fact that the relationship is mostly and illusion from the woman's point of view (ie she can and will walk with no notice and no reason at all) and you have a highly unstable situation where nobody is getting their needs met.

To fight against this, people have to study the situation and bring what they are doing into conscious awareness, and focus their will on making changes.

For example, I discovered that even though most women won't signal interest, a man can provoke her by skipping a step. Simply looking any woman you meet directly in the eyes and seeing if she looks back, and then smiling if she does... this forces her to say yes or no with her body language. That's an aggressive thing to do (in non-neurotic cultures, women signal first, not men) but it is still in the realm of acceptable behavior. Men going, "hey, baby, hey baby," while you are trying to get to work, or worse, approaching when you make it clear they are not welcome, isn't acceptable. It means the guy is either a dumbass or a psycho. Unfortunately, alot of women are open to them during their 10%.

As a woman, it is extremely easy to get around this. First, choose who you want. Then, do what a man would do. Look him right in the eyes and smile. You might have to do it several times if he is a dumbass. He'll usually approach you unless he is taken.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“Women chat happily, send sexually explicit signals and encourage the man’s attention, even if they have absolutely no interest in him. This gives a woman time to assess a man, say [Karl Grammer of the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute of Urban Ethology in Vienna, who studied 45 male-female pairs of strangers in their teens and early twenties]… Importantly, the women also seemed to control the encounter – what the women did had a direct effect on what the men did next. ‘You can predict male behaviour from female behaviour but not the other way around,’ says Grammer”New Scientist Magazine (London), February 14, 2001

------------

Cary (1976) discovered that the woman, through eye contact, controlled the course of interaction with a male stranger, both in the laboratory and in singles' bars. Perper (1985) gave a detailed description of courtship, stressing an escalation-response process in which women play a key role in escalation or deescalation. The steps in this process are approach, turn, first touch, and steady development of body synchronization.

Although these reports are clearly valuable, most researchers addressed courtship very generally, and some failed to recognize the importance of the female role in the courtship process .What was needed was a more complete ethogram of women's nonverbal courtship signals. To compile such a catalog of flirting behavior exhibited by women involved in initial heterosexual interaction, more than 200 adults were observed (Moore, 1985) in field settings such as singles' bars, restaurants, and parties.

Research has shown, therefore, that the cultural myth that the man is always the sexual aggressor, pressing himself on a reluctant woman, is incorrect. -- Courtship Signaling and Adolescents: "Girls Just Wanna Have Fun"? Monica M. Moore, Ph.D.Department of behavioral and Social Sciences, Webster University

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Zenpriest #40 - Girls Just Wanna Have Fun

Philalethes #29 - They Can Do It Because They Really Believe It!

Rats!

Monday, February 16, 2004

Bonecrker #47 - Living in La-La-Land

I think that the basic problem is that most women here are only interested in the fantasy of living life and not the reality of it. Only what is going on in their heads matters to them, not what is actually going on outside in the real world. Any time there is a conflict between the two, they treat what's in their head as true rather than what's outside. That's the very definition of a crazy person. A big problem with that is what goes on in your head is transitory and ephemeral. It disappears as soon as you daydream about something else.

However, the behavior women do based on this have very real and permanent consequences.

For example, if you have some fantasy about being in love with a guy, marry him and then have kids, but 10 years later you lose interest in that fantasy, the consequences of that are rather harsh. And women never seem to realize what is at the root of their problems. They tend to blame the problems on men. Blah, blah, blah... I don't love you anymore because you are boring, unromantic and a whole bunch of other things that are thinly veiled bullshit with no basis in reality. The truth is they were never in love in the first place. Love has to do with what you do outside in the real world... your behavior and what you build with it. It has nothing to do with what is going on in your head, even though what is going on in your head may be fun and exciting.

I think a pretty basic thing every man needs to pay attention to when in any relationship is how much does the woman's behavior match up with what she is saying. She says "I love you", but does she act in a loving manner? Does she do things that are incompatible with a person who loves you? Most importantly, does she work toward long term goals based on nurturing a love relationship that is permanent, or is she just along for the ride. Very few women act in any way except just enjoying the moment. What that means is, your behavior and the decisions you make with regard to her should be based on that. I think it is inappropriate to be monogamous with someone who is just having fun times with you. Certainly it is not a good idea live with themmarry them and God forbid, have children with them. Those things absolutely require certain continuous and extended behaviours that the woman (and men and women are absolutely different in this regard) is just not interested in.

To put it another way: American men make the best husbands on the planet. But, American women make the worst wives.

Everyone except Americans seems to know it, too.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Further Reading:

Bonecrker #74 – All Married Women Are Available

Bonecrcker #181 - Women Don’t Hate Men, But They Don’t Love Them Either

Bonecrcker #182 – Women Want Strong Emotions But Don’t Care If Those Emotions Are Negative

Pook #40 - Do Girls Want Sovereignty?

Empty Vessels and Relative Truth

Sunday, February 15, 2004

Bonecrker #46 - Feminism Turns Women Into Mere Sex Objects

Feminism has created a situation where women are usually useless for anything except sexual recreation (many are useless for that too). That is the point of feminism... to marginalize women by turning them into whores (has there ever been a society where a whore was anywhere but at the bottom?) That's why looks are such a big deal these days. Feminists sold this sick situation by telling women that they were doing the opposite. Their behaviours just don't match the goals they give lip service to. It's a huge scam.

I've said it before and I'll say it again. The woman who works very hard at being worth more than the use of her body as a fuck toy, has such an incredible advantage over all other woman that she can basically pick and choose whomever and whatever she wants. A woman of quality is so rare that men (once they figure it out) will run over themselves trying to get to her. Of course, there are a few dipshits who just want T & A. But, you don't want them.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related:

Bonecrcker #54 – Women Should Cultivate Anything That Typically Is A Virtue (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #151 – The Woman Who Is The Exception Phenomenon (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #154 – Women Are Bitches To Nice Girls (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #167 – Advice For Women on Inviting Men To Approach You (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #174 – The Measure of a Person’s Worth Is Their Actions (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #176 – Women Making More Money Than Their Husbands (advice to women)

Bonecrcker #177 – Responsibility and Power Go Hand In Hand (advice to women)

Saturday, February 14, 2004

Bonecrker #45 - Niceguys

One of the things I don't like about the "niceguy" label is the assumption that niceguys are nice because they are afraid to be otherwise or it is part of approval seeking behavior or that the world revolves around ruthless, brutal behavior of which niceguys are ignorant and victims of.

This just isn't true.

What is true is that almost anything of any worth has been created by the good people of the world, despite negative influences. Bad people create jack shit. And that goodness flows from strength. It is the assholes of the world who are not doing what they are supposed to be doing, making life shitty for everyone. I'm not a niceguy because I was born that way. Nor am I a niceguy because of socialization. I'm a niceguy because I specifically choose to be so. It's part of my method of living a good, decent and satisfying life, because I have noticed that people who are not "nice" simply aren't able to get that for themselves.

Being an asshole is a weakness that makes a person's life sad and pathetic... all the while desperately trying to fool themselves and others that it isn't so.

Previous Bonecrker Index Next

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related:

Bonecrcker #64 – On Players